Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yanaki Milev vs Tommaso Carnevale-Miino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milev vs Carnevale-Miino analysis and find out who is favored!
Yanaki Milev vs Tommaso Carnevale-Miino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milev has won 47.04% of points on his second serve, while Carnevale-Miino has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milev, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carnevale-Miino has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.82% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milev has saved 56.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carnevale-Miino has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milev has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 30/ 27), with Carnevale-Miino winning 51.61% (W/L 16/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 69/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Carnevale-Miino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 28/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Milev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14), where as Carnevale-Miino has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.61% of matches (W/L 16/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milev winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Milev winning 2 and Carnevale-Miino winning 0. The last match between Milev and Carnevale-Miino was at the M15 Antalya, 18-01-2023, First, Clay with Yanaki Milev getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milev and Carnevale-Miino have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milev winning 0 times and Carnevale-Miino 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Milev winning 1, and Carnevale-Miino 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milev has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.12 while Carnevale-Miino has played against players with an average rank of 16.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milev has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carnevale-Miino has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milev has converted 49.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carnevale-Miino has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Milev 1 - 0 Carnevale-Miino
550
Rank
482
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
58% (74-53)
Career Total W/L
48% (87-94)
59% (16-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Milev VS Carnevale-Miino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Tommaso Carnevale-Miino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (34/59) | 72% (43/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (24/34) | 56% (24/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 24% (4/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (7/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (32/60) | 42% (25/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Milev VS Carnevale-Miino H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Tommaso Carnevale-Miino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (16/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (38/29) | 33% (1/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (336/300) | 47% (16/18) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (16/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 94 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 139.56 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1144/2009) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (794/1144) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (403/865) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (106/213) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (851/1966) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (15/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (16/27) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (17/14) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (17/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Yanaki Milev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Stijn Slump
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
48 of
102)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Kokoro Isomura
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tomas Lanik
60%
(
78 of
131)
1st Serve %
52%
(
65 of
124)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Constantin Spiridon
Player
Yanaki Milev
63%
(
67 of
106)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
103)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Yanaki Milev
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Fabrizio Andaloro
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Yanaki Milev
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Majdandzic
Player
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Jurajda
Player
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Schonenberg
Player
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommaso Carnevale-Miino
Player
Florian Broska
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Milev Vs Carnevale-Miino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
