Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Xiaofei Wang vs Terence Atmane Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Atmane analysis and find out who is favored!
Xiaofei Wang vs Terence Atmane Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 20% of points on his second serve, while Atmane has won 49.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Atmane has won 46.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25% and 28.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 33.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Atmane has saved 66.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 12/ 14), with Atmane winning 61.73% (W/L 50/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47). Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 10/ 9), where as Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.21% of matches (W/L 33/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wang winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Wang winning 0 and Atmane winning 1. The last match between Wang and Atmane was at the M15 Monastir, 29-06-2022, First, Hard with Terence Atmane getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Atmane have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wang winning 0 times and Atmane 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Atmane 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.92 while Atmane has played against players with an average rank of 233.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Atmane has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Atmane has converted 43.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wang 0 - 1 Atmane
794
Rank
694
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
135
Rank
127
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (64-49)
Career Total W/L
63% (179-105)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (14-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$243,885
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Xiaofei Wang | Terence Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 1 |
| Games Won | 4 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:41:0 | 0:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (14/24) | 57% (20/35) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (10/14) | 70% (14/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (7/10) | 73% (11/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 29% (10/35) | 29% (7/24) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-4 ret. |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
Xiaofei Wang
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
14 of
24)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
32
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Xiaofei Wang | Terence Atmane |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (14/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (33/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (310/323) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (12/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.58 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 180 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 176.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (1202/2065) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (858/1202) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (414/863) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (67/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (679/1897) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (14/4) |
Xiaofei Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Lavizzari
Player
Xiaofei Wang
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
10 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Xiaofei Wang
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
17 of
19)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Xiaofei Wang
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Hanwen Li
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arjun Kadhe
Player
Xiaofei Wang
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
8
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Xiaofei Wang
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Jiayang Dong
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aoran Wang
Player
Xiaofei Wang
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiaofei Wang
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Terence Atmane
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Terence Atmane
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Zachary Svajda
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Sebastian Ofner
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wang Vs Atmane Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
