Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Verena Meliss vs Cristiana Ferrando Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Meliss vs Ferrando analysis and find out who is favored!
Verena Meliss vs Cristiana Ferrando Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Meliss 0 - 3 Ferrando
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meliss has won 40.77% of points on his second serve, while Ferrando has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meliss, in recent form, has won 58.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ferrando has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.79% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Meliss has saved 49.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ferrando has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Meliss has won 55.36% of matches played (W/L 31/ 25), with Ferrando winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Meliss has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 144/ 163). Ferrando has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 102/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Meliss has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 15/ 18), where as Ferrando has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Meliss winning 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Meliss winning 0 and Ferrando winning 6. The last match between Meliss and Ferrando was at the W60 Amstelveen, 07-07-2021, First, Clay with Cristiana Ferrando getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Meliss and Ferrando have played a deciding set 0 times, with Meliss winning 0 times and Ferrando 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Meliss winning 0, and Ferrando 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meliss has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.05 while Ferrando has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meliss has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ferrando has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Meliss has converted 53.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ferrando has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Meliss 0 - 3 Ferrando
691
Rank
487
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total3
0
Hard0
0
Clay3
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
247
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
48% (197-215)
Career Total W/L
56% (280-216)
61% (19-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$43,007
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Verena Meliss | Cristiana Ferrando |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 6 |
| Games Won | 18 | 37 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:20 | 1:29:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (120/187) | 68% (116/171) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (63/120) | 70% (81/116) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (20/67) | 47% (26/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 53% (16/30) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (64/171) | 56% (104/187) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats 
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Verena Meliss
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Verena Meliss
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Verena Meliss
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Verena Meliss | Cristiana Ferrando |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (19/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (41/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (346/270) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (18/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.52 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 155 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:17 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.81 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1232/1904) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (764/1232) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (274/672) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (151/282) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (935/1862) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Verena Meliss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Valeriya Yushchenko
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
12
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
54%
(
51 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
59 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Selina Atay
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anika Jaskova
Player
Verena Meliss
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Dana Baidaulet
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Doga Turkmen
60%
(
72 of
121)
1st Serve %
73%
(
82 of
112)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
49%
(
59 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Verena Meliss
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Martina Spigarelli
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve %
65%
(
11 of
17)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
25
Total Points Won
6
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Di Sarra
Player
Verena Meliss
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cristiana Ferrando Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ela Nala Milic
Player
Cristiana Ferrando
58%
(
69 of
118)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
50 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
118
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Miriana Tona
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Lilli Tagger
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Cristiana Ferrando
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Andre Lukosiute
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Cristiana Ferrando
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Nadine Keller
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Ya Hsin Lee
68%
(
81 of
119)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
115)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristiana Ferrando
Player
Alice Battesti
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Meliss Vs Ferrando Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
