Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tristan Schoolkate vs Fermin Tenti Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schoolkate vs Tenti analysis and find out who is favored!
Tristan Schoolkate vs Fermin Tenti Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schoolkate has won 51.11% of points on his second serve, while Tenti has won 46.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schoolkate, in recent form, has won 47.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tenti has won 54.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.76% and 38.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schoolkate has saved 56.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tenti has saved 57.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schoolkate has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 40/ 30), with Tenti winning 49.15% (W/L 29/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schoolkate has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 15/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 24/ 22). Tenti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 211/ 188), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 26/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Schoolkate has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.35% of matches (W/L 39/ 29), where as Tenti has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.91% of matches (W/L 28/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schoolkate winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schoolkate winning 2 and Tenti winning 0. The last match between Schoolkate and Tenti was at the M15 Cairo, 07-05-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Tristan Schoolkate getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schoolkate and Tenti have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schoolkate winning 0 times and Tenti 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schoolkate winning 0, and Tenti 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schoolkate has played against opponents with an average rank of 248.17 while Tenti has played against players with an average rank of 158.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schoolkate has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tenti has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schoolkate has converted 35.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tenti has converted 43.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schoolkate 1 - 0 Tenti
187
Rank
187
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
840
Rank
561
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
59% (145-101)
Career Total W/L
52% (237-220)
61% (20-13)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$65,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schoolkate VS Tenti H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tristan Schoolkate | Fermin Tenti |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (42/70) | 71% (42/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (34/42) | 74% (31/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (16/28) | 47% (8/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (20/59) | 29% (20/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Schoolkate VS Tenti H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Fermin Tenti
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tristan Schoolkate | Fermin Tenti |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (20/13) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (42/33) | 58% (31/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (377/349) | 54% (273/235) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 65% (20/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 59% (13/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.76 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 268 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.07 |
| DFs Total | 117 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:13 | 1:37:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 263.82 | 68.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1257/2206) | 67% (763/1135) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (971/1257) | 60% (457/763) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (485/949) | 47% (173/372) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (69/195) | 47% (63/135) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (825/2275) | 45% (512/1129) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (19/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (20/33) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (10/14) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (17/5) | 20% (10/2) |
Tristan Schoolkate Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yi Zhou
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Adam Walton
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Maxime Cressy
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
66 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
11
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Mattia Bellucci
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Denis Yevseyev
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
9
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alex Bolt
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve %
56%
(
15 of
27)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
38
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Fermin Tenti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
71%
(
102 of
144)
1st Serve %
56%
(
90 of
161)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
57 of
90)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
59 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
72 of
161)
157
Total Points Won
148
|
6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Franco Ribero
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Nicolas Villalon
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
97)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Nicolas Bruna
75%
(
77 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Fermin Tenti
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Fermin Tenti
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
88 of
124)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
64 of
124)
115
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Manuel La Serna
Player
Fermin Tenti
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
76 of
110)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Alberto Alvarado Berrospi
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikos Lehmann
Player
Fermin Tenti
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
24 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Schoolkate Vs Tenti Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
