Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timea Babos vs Nina Stojanovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Babos vs Stojanovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Timea Babos vs Nina Stojanovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Babos has won 46.07% of points on his second serve, while Stojanovic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Babos, in recent form, has won 49.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stojanovic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.97% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Babos has saved 59.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stojanovic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Babos has won 51.92% of matches played (W/L 27/ 25), with Stojanovic winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Babos has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 82/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 24/ 32). Stojanovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 139/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Babos has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.84% of matches (W/L 17/ 14), where as Stojanovic has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Babos winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Babos winning 1 and Stojanovic winning 2. The last match between Babos and Stojanovic was at the Shenzhen Open - Shenzhen, 02-01-2017, First, Hard with Nina Stojanovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Babos and Stojanovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Babos winning 0 times and Stojanovic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Babos winning 0, and Stojanovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Babos has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.23 while Stojanovic has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Babos has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stojanovic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Babos has converted 40.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stojanovic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Babos 0 - 1 Stojanovic
196
Rank
25
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
688
Rank
81
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
56% (431-332)
Career Total W/L
59% (245-168)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,900,606
Career Prize Money
$296,133
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Babos VS Stojanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Timea Babos | Nina Stojanovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:44 | 2:0:44 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (58/92) | 56% (49/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (38/58) | 73% (36/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (19/34) | 46% (18/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (34/88) | 38% (35/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Babos VS Stojanovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Timea Babos
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timea Babos | Nina Stojanovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (26/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (236/229) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 74 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:56 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 244.95 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (987/1550) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (626/987) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (263/563) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (80/192) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (666/1559) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Timea Babos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Timea Babos
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Victoria Osuigwe
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Timea Babos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Timea Babos
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Ipek Oz
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Timea Babos
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nina Stojanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Nina Stojanovic
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
68%
(
80 of
117)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
43 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
113
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(10) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Alina Korneeva
64%
(
73 of
114)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
51 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Magali Kempen
66%
(
79 of
120)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
7
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
4
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
50 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Yuliya Hatouka
72%
(
86 of
120)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
11
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
65%
(
79 of
122)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
110)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
52 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
110)
122
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Nina Stojanovic
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Sowjanya Bavisetti
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Nina Stojanovic
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Laura Pigossi
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Babos Vs Stojanovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Timea Babos
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
