Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Peter Gojowczyk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Gojowczyk analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Peter Gojowczyk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 48.02% of points on his second serve, while Gojowczyk has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 51.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gojowczyk has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.82% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 65.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gojowczyk has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 45/ 27), with Gojowczyk winning 58.82% (W/L 20/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 190/ 128), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Gojowczyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 207/ 147), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 113/ 128).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16), where as Gojowczyk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wild winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wild winning 0 and Gojowczyk winning 2. The last match between Wild and Gojowczyk was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 14-01-2020, Q1 round, Hard with Peter Gojowczyk getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wild and Gojowczyk have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wild winning 0 times and Gojowczyk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wild winning 0, and Gojowczyk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.79 while Gojowczyk has played against players with an average rank of 329.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gojowczyk has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 44.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gojowczyk has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wild 0 - 1 Gojowczyk
61
Rank
61
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
456
Rank
39
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
57% (224-168)
Career Total W/L
55% (532-441)
54% (15-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$668,565
Career Prize Money
$1,837,855
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Peter Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:0 | 1:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (27/51) | 51% (27/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (18/27) | 96% (26/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (12/24) | 46% (12/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (15/53) | 41% (21/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Peter Gojowczyk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (15/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (38/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (333/316) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 142 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 198.61 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1345/2128) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (959/1345) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (376/783) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (71/160) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (696/1941) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (15/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Roman Safiullin
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Luca Nardi
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
13
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Taylor Fritz
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nuno Borges
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Damir Dzumhur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Gojowczyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
11
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Akira Santillan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Yanki Erel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Gojowczyk Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Thiago Seyboth Wild
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
