Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Terence Atmane vs Kris Van Wyk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Atmane vs Wyk analysis and find out who is favored!
Terence Atmane vs Kris Van Wyk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Atmane has won 48.67% of points on his second serve, while Wyk has won 48.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Atmane, in recent form, has won 46.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wyk has won 52.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.92% and 37.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Atmane has saved 66.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wyk has saved 56.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Atmane has won 63.1% of matches played (W/L 53/ 31), with Wyk winning 62.89% (W/L 61/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 141/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9). Wyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 145/ 80), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.21% of matches (W/L 33/ 14), where as Wyk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.13% of matches (W/L 59/ 33). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Atmane winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Atmane winning 2 and Wyk winning 0. The last match between Atmane and Wyk was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 06-11-2022, Final, Hard with Terence Atmane getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Atmane and Wyk have played a deciding set 0 times, with Atmane winning 0 times and Wyk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Atmane winning 0, and Wyk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Atmane has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.33 while Wyk has played against players with an average rank of 107.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Atmane has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wyk has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Atmane has converted 42.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wyk has converted 45.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Atmane 1 - 0 Wyk
137
Rank
127
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
423
Rank
365
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
63% (182-105)
Career Total W/L
64% (146-82)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
63% (24-14)
$274,110
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Terence Atmane | Kris Van Wyk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (32/58) | 64% (35/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (23/32) | 71% (25/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (24/55) | 31% (18/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
Kris Van Wyk
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Terence Atmane | Kris Van Wyk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 63% (24/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (39/34) | 58% (51/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (350/353) | 54% (427/366) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 63% (24/14) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 192 | 176 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 119 | 175 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:5 | 1:47:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 183.73 | 133.26 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1346/2287) | 59% (1471/2494) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (965/1346) | 68% (995/1471) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (458/941) | 49% (497/1023) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (74/174) | 46% (143/310) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (747/2102) | 44% (1148/2612) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (22/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 63% (24/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 75% (9/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 95% (20/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 5% (20/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 28% (18/5) |
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Christopher Eubanks
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Harold Mayot
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Terence Atmane
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Terence Atmane
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Kris Van Wyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Rohan Mehra
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Kris Van Wyk
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Diogo Marques
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Jordan Chiu
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Kris Van Wyk
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
78%
(
67 of
86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Demetris Azoides
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Abel Forger
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Tai Sach
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kris Van Wyk
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Atmane Vs Wyk Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Terence Atmane
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Kris Van Wyk
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
