Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tennys Sandgren vs Filip Peliwo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs Peliwo analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs Filip Peliwo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 50.67% of points on his second serve, while Peliwo has won 51.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 47.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Peliwo has won 54.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.27% and 34.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 65.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peliwo has saved 55.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 53.45% of matches played (W/L 31/ 27), with Peliwo winning 55.41% (W/L 41/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). Peliwo has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 92/ 65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22), where as Peliwo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sandgren winning 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Sandgren winning 6 and Peliwo winning 1. The last match between Sandgren and Peliwo was at the Canada F8, 31-08-2015, Second, Hard with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:13:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandgren and Peliwo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sandgren winning 1 times and Peliwo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Sandgren winning 1, and Peliwo 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.5 while Peliwo has played against players with an average rank of 145.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peliwo has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 31.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peliwo has converted 48.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandgren 3 - 0 Peliwo
260
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
459
Rank
161
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
56% (421-325)
Career Total W/L
56% (398-309)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$2,256,263
Career Prize Money
$50,555
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tennys Sandgren | Filip Peliwo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
| Games Won | 44 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:13:36 | 0:13:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (23/32) | 48% (16/33) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (20/23) | 44% (7/16) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 89% (8/9) | 24% (4/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 67% (22/33) | 13% (4/32) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(4) 7-5 | |||||
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Filip Peliwo
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50
Total Points Won
15
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tennys Sandgren | Filip Peliwo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (34/21) | 55% (24/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (292/260) | 50% (201/204) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.86 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 232 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 32 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:31 | 1:27:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 320.86 | 177.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1039/1740) | 59% (756/1281) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (803/1039) | 65% (488/756) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (355/701) | 51% (269/525) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (51/157) | 48% (57/118) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (634/1769) | 41% (516/1255) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 100% (11/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 0% (11/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (10/0) |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Peliwo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Filip Peliwo
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Filip Peliwo
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Ali Habib
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Marcus Walters
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Amr Elsayed
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Filip Peliwo
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Seydina Andre
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandgren Vs Peliwo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
