Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Taro Daniel vs Daniel Brands Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Daniel vs Brands analysis and find out who is favored!
Taro Daniel vs Daniel Brands Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel has won 50.26% of points on his second serve, while Brands has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel, in recent form, has won 48.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brands has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.41% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel has saved 59.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brands has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/ 31), with Brands winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 301/ 196), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/ 14), where as Brands has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Daniel winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Daniel winning 4 and Brands winning 0. The last match between Daniel and Brands was at the Barcelona Open BancSabadell - Barcelona, 23-04-2017, Q3, Clay with Taro Daniel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniel and Brands have played a deciding set 0 times, with Daniel winning 0 times and Brands 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Daniel winning 1, and Brands 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.59 while Brands has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brands has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel has converted 47.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brands has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Daniel 2 - 0 Brands
82
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
58% (547-391)
Career Total W/L
56% (482-380)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,184,359
Career Prize Money
$765,635
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Taro Daniel | Daniel Brands |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:38 | 1:15:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (84/110) | 69% (78/113) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (72/84) | 67% (52/78) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (16/26) | 66% (23/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (38/113) | 20% (22/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Brands
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Brands
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
0
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
45 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
11 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Taro Daniel | Daniel Brands |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (24/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (253/279) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 92 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:51 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 169.71 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1056/1709) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (713/1056) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (324/653) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (54/116) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (578/1621) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
11
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
20 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
76%
(
73 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
2
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Christopher O'Connell
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Vs Brands Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
