Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tamira Paszek vs Petra Marcinko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paszek vs Marcinko analysis and find out who is favored!
Tamira Paszek vs Petra Marcinko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paszek has won 44.51% of points on his second serve, while Marcinko has won 41.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paszek, in recent form, has won 58.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marcinko has won 46.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.61% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paszek has saved 53.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marcinko has saved 46.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paszek has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 44/ 24), with Marcinko winning 65.63% (W/L 21/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paszek has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 56/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 49/ 47). Marcinko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 51/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Paszek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 36/ 21), where as Marcinko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paszek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paszek winning 2 and Marcinko winning 0. The last match between Paszek and Marcinko was at the W15 Monastir, 15-10-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Tamira Paszek getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paszek and Marcinko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paszek winning 0 times and Marcinko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paszek winning 1, and Marcinko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paszek has played against opponents with an average rank of 315.65 while Marcinko has played against players with an average rank of 274.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paszek has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marcinko has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paszek has converted 53.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marcinko has converted 36.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paszek 1 - 0 Marcinko
324
Rank
26
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
218
Rank
132
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
57% (394-299)
Career Total W/L
67% (80-40)
69% (20-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$1,345,638
Career Prize Money
$142,470
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Petra Marcinko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (62/81) | 61% (49/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (32/62) | 59% (29/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (11/19) | 29% (9/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (42/80) | 47% (38/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Tamira Paszek
Player
Petra Marcinko
77%
(
62 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Petra Marcinko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (20/9) | 0% (0/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (42/21) | 0% (0/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (338/259) | 34% (20/38) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (15/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:49 | 1:26:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288.45 | 246.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1262/1768) | 60% (111/186) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (747/1262) | 57% (63/111) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (226/506) | 39% (29/75) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (137/259) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (891/1785) | 38% (73/191) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (20/29) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (3/0) |
Tamira Paszek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Hannah Klugman
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
52%
(
29 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Klaudija Bubelyte
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Katarina Stresnakova
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
53%
(
47 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
53 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Sophie Drakeford-Lewis
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Tamira Paszek
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Jessica Failla
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Sophie Drakeford-Lewis
78%
(
92 of
118)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Petra Marcinko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Petra Marcinko
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Petra Marcinko
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Petra Marcinko
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Petra Marcinko
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
22%
(
2 of
9)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
4
Total Points Won
11
|
0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Petra Marcinko
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Alina Korneeva
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Alice Robbe
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Maria Bondarenko
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paszek Vs Marcinko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tamira Paszek
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
