Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tamara Zidansek vs Timea Babos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zidansek vs Babos analysis and find out who is favored!
Tamara Zidansek vs Timea Babos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zidansek has won 39.95% of points on his second serve, while Babos has won 46.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zidansek, in recent form, has won 51.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Babos has won 49.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.87% and 37.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zidansek has saved 57.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Babos has saved 59.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zidansek has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 24), with Babos winning 53.7% (W/L 29/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zidansek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 73% (W/L 224/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Babos has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 82/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 24/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Zidansek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 12), where as Babos has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 19/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zidansek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zidansek winning 2 and Babos winning 0. The last match between Zidansek and Babos was at the Thailand Open - Hua Hin, 29-01-2019, First, Hard with Tamara Zidansek getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zidansek and Babos have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zidansek winning 0 times and Babos 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zidansek winning 0, and Babos 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zidansek has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.35 while Babos has played against players with an average rank of 240.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zidansek has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Babos has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zidansek has converted 39.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Babos has converted 40.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zidansek 1 - 0 Babos
135
Rank
22
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
180
Rank
25
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
65% (331-181)
Career Total W/L
56% (431-332)
18% (2-9)
YTD W/L
55% (11-9)
$1,694,181
Career Prize Money
$1,900,606
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tamara Zidansek | Timea Babos |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 9 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:28 | 0:49:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (24/35) | 50% (20/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (18/24) | 55% (11/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (6/11) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (23/40) | 31% (11/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Timea Babos
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
47
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tamara Zidansek | Timea Babos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 18% (2/9) | 55% (11/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (7/19) | 55% (26/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (97/143) | 51% (236/229) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 74 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:58 | 2:1:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 143.82 | 244.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (520/842) | 64% (987/1550) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (312/520) | 63% (626/987) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (129/322) | 47% (263/563) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (31/87) | 42% (80/192) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (315/801) | 43% (666/1559) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (2/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 18% (2/11) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 14% (7/1) |
Tamara Zidansek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Tamara Zidansek
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Tamara Zidansek
50%
(
54 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Tamara Zidansek
77%
(
77 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Tamara Zidansek
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Tamara Zidansek
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
6
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Tamara Zidansek
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Nefisa Berberovic
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Tamara Zidansek
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Tamara Zidansek
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Timea Babos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Timea Babos
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Victoria Osuigwe
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Timea Babos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Timea Babos
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Ipek Oz
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Timea Babos
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zidansek Vs Babos Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
