Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tamara Malesevic vs Amelia Stuart Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Malesevic vs Stuart analysis and find out who is favored!
Tamara Malesevic vs Amelia Stuart Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Malesevic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Stuart has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Malesevic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stuart has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Malesevic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stuart has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Malesevic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Stuart winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Malesevic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Stuart has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Malesevic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Stuart has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Malesevic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stuart has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Malesevic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stuart has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Malesevic 0 - 0 Stuart
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tamara Malesevic | Amelia Stuart |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tamara Malesevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Denislava Glushkova
Player
Tamara Malesevic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Tamara Malesevic
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Tamara Malesevic
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louise Brunskog
Player
Tamara Malesevic
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleni Christofi
Player
Tamara Malesevic
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
8
Total Points Won
3
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simona Ogescu
Player
Tamara Malesevic
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Malesevic
Player
Camille Moga
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Milatova
Player
Tamara Malesevic
42%
(
28 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Malesevic
Player
Doroteja Petrovic
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aneta Laboutkova
Player
Tamara Malesevic
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Amelia Stuart Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Malesevic Vs Stuart Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
