Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Suzan Lamens vs Shiho Akita Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lamens vs Akita analysis and find out who is favored!
Suzan Lamens vs Shiho Akita Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lamens has won 43.32% of points on his second serve, while Akita has won 36.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lamens, in recent form, has won 57.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Akita has won 60.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.25% and 42.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lamens has saved 55.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Akita has saved 49.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lamens has won 64.2% of matches played (W/L 52/ 29), with Akita winning 50% (W/L 23/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lamens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 175/ 112), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Akita has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 46/ 23), where as Akita has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lamens winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lamens winning 2 and Akita winning 0. The last match between Lamens and Akita was at the W15 Manacor, 05-02-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Suzan Lamens getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lamens and Akita have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lamens winning 0 times and Akita 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lamens winning 0, and Akita 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lamens has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.15 while Akita has played against players with an average rank of 157.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lamens has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Akita has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lamens has converted 50.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Akita has converted 51.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lamens 1 - 0 Akita
131
Rank
131
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
609
Rank
221
High
34
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
58% (263-189)
Career Total W/L
55% (337-272)
73% (24-9)
YTD W/L
50% (8-8)
$40,693
Career Prize Money
$3,720
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Shiho Akita |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (31/49) | 55% (28/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (20/31) | 61% (17/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (8/18) | 22% (5/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (29/51) | 43% (21/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Suzan Lamens
Player
Shiho Akita
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Suzan Lamens | Shiho Akita |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (24/9) | 50% (8/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (49/29) | 49% (19/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (399/309) | 48% (175/193) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (12/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 69 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 98 | 86 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:42 | 1:41:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 240.12 | 182.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1277/2105) | 62% (667/1074) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (812/1277) | 54% (360/667) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (375/828) | 37% (150/407) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (145/287) | 51% (72/142) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1022/2132) | 49% (504/1033) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (18/6) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (23/32) | 50% (8/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 91% (10/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (20/19) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (20/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 30% (10/3) |
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Suzan Lamens
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Clara Tauson
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
49%
(
55 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Shiho Akita Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Vaishnavi Adkar
Player
Shiho Akita
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
54%
(
37 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Shiho Akita
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
109)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Gaia Parravicini
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shiho Akita
Player
Haruna Arakawa
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
36 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayano Shimizu
Player
Shiho Akita
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
48 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
50 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chantal Sauvant
Player
Shiho Akita
88%
(
45 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Judith Perello Saavedra
Player
Shiho Akita
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
34 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
view more
Lamens Vs Akita Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
