Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stuart Parker vs Andrew Paulson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Parker vs Paulson analysis and find out who is favored!
Stuart Parker vs Andrew Paulson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Parker has won 51.37% of points on his second serve, while Paulson has won 49.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Parker, in recent form, has won 52.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paulson has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.63% and 18.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Parker has saved 57.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paulson has saved 41.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Parker has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 38/ 19), with Paulson winning 66.67% (W/L 34/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Parker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 126/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Paulson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 26/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24).
- Player level: In the last year, Parker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 33/ 15), where as Paulson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Parker winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Parker winning 3 and Paulson winning 2. The last match between Parker and Paulson was at the M25 Prague, 16-05-2023, First, Clay with Andrew Paulson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Parker and Paulson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Parker winning 0 times and Paulson 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Parker winning 0, and Paulson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Parker has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.67 while Paulson has played against players with an average rank of 297.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Parker has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paulson has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Parker has converted 48.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paulson has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Parker 1 - 1 Paulson
627
Rank
346
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
316
Rank
302
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
65% (179-97)
Career Total W/L
63% (154-91)
81% (21-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Stuart Parker | Andrew Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 23 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:30 | 1:33:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (86/124) | 62% (78/126) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (63/86) | 65% (51/78) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (18/38) | 50% (24/48) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (51/126) | 35% (43/124) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Andrew Paulson
Player
Stuart Parker
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Andrew Paulson
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stuart Parker | Andrew Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 79% (42/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (304/207) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (17/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 73 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 184.58 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (907/1339) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (635/907) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (224/432) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (81/166) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (628/1399) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 77% (17/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 81% (21/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (20/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (20/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Karan Singh
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Felipe Virgili Berini
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Stuart Parker
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Antoine Vincent
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Stuart Parker
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Moerani Bouzige
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrew Paulson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
Andrew Paulson
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
10
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Andrew Paulson
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
51 of
101)
20
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Andrew Paulson
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
84)
13
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
90%
(
45 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Louis Wessels
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
19
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
11
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Jakob Schnaitter
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Andrew Paulson
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andrew Paulson
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Andrew Paulson
80%
(
68 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Parker Vs Paulson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
