Sebastian Lavie vs Charles Minc Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lavie vs Minc analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Lavie vs Charles Minc Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lavie has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Minc has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lavie, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Minc has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lavie has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minc has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lavie has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Minc winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lavie has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 19/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lavie has played against opponents with an average rank of while Minc has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lavie has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minc has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lavie has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minc has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lavie 0 - 0 Minc
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
784
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
36% (36-65)
Career Total W/L
38% (24-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$715
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sebastian Lavie | Charles Minc |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sebastian Lavie Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Lavie
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Paul-Henri Mathieu
Player
Sebastian Lavie
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Sebastian Lavie
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Sebastian Lavie
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Lavie
Player
Ben Mclachlan
47%
(
36 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
3
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
QF |
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more