Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sebastian Gima vs Edison Ambarzumjan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gima vs Ambarzumjan analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Gima vs Edison Ambarzumjan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gima has won 49.4% of points on his second serve, while Ambarzumjan has won 42.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gima, in recent form, has won 56.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ambarzumjan has won 51.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.93% and 28.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gima has saved 62.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ambarzumjan has saved 59.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gima has won 59.77% of matches played (W/L 52/ 35), with Ambarzumjan winning 54.55% (W/L 18/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Ambarzumjan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.51% of matches (W/L 47/ 27), where as Ambarzumjan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 18/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gima winning 2 and Ambarzumjan winning 0. The last match between Gima and Ambarzumjan was at the M25 Rovinj, 14-03-2022, Q2 round, Clay with Sebastian Gima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gima and Ambarzumjan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gima winning 0 times and Ambarzumjan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gima winning 0, and Ambarzumjan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gima has played against opponents with an average rank of 172.94 while Ambarzumjan has played against players with an average rank of 68.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gima has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ambarzumjan has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gima has converted 42.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ambarzumjan has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gima 1 - 0 Ambarzumjan
465
Rank
436
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
59% (168-119)
Career Total W/L
49% (37-38)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gima VS Ambarzumjan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sebastian Gima | Edison Ambarzumjan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:54:0 | 0:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (22/45) | 32% (11/34) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (16/22) | 18% (2/11) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (10/23) | 17% (4/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (7/7) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 82% (28/34) | 42% (19/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gima VS Ambarzumjan H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Sebastian Gima
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
32%
(
11 of
34)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sebastian Gima | Edison Ambarzumjan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (31/26) | 57% (20/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (266/240) | 52% (181/168) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:31 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.68 | 44.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (983/1637) | 57% (273/483) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (637/983) | 67% (184/273) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (328/654) | 43% (91/210) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (87/199) | 44% (16/36) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (734/1688) | 37% (166/444) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (13/8) | 56% (9/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (5/0) |
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Duda
Player
Sebastian Gima
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Dario Drebenstedt
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
42%
(
15 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Sebastian Gima
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Sebastian Gima
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Marco Miceli
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jan Hrazdil
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Edison Ambarzumjan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 2-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Lopez
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 0-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Benjamin Privara
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
0
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Gima Vs Ambarzumjan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
