Sean Hodkin vs Benjamin Pietri Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hodkin vs Pietri analysis and find out who is favored!
Sean Hodkin vs Benjamin Pietri Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hodkin has won 47.18% of points on his second serve, while Pietri has won 50.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hodkin, in recent form, has won 51.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pietri has won 48.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.1% and 36.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hodkin has saved 56.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pietri has saved 61.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hodkin has won 55.32% of matches played (W/L 26/ 21), with Pietri winning 62.07% (W/L 36/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hodkin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 95/ 73), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Pietri has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 118/ 69), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hodkin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.32% of matches (W/L 26/ 21), where as Pietri has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 36/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hodkin winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hodkin winning 0 and Pietri winning 2. The last match between Hodkin and Pietri was at the M15 Monastir, 26-04-2021, Q3, Hard with Benjamin Pietri getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hodkin and Pietri have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hodkin winning 0 times and Pietri 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hodkin winning 0, and Pietri 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hodkin has played against opponents with an average rank of 128.83 while Pietri has played against players with an average rank of 114.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hodkin has won 70% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pietri has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hodkin has converted 57.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pietri has converted 49.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hodkin 0 - 1 Pietri
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
892
Rank
663
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (165-138)
Career Total W/L
58% (216-155)
50% (6-6)
YTD W/L
68% (19-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sean Hodkin | Benjamin Pietri |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 2 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sean Hodkin | Benjamin Pietri |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (6/6) | 68% (19/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 46% (12/14) | 67% (40/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (127/130) | 56% (320/248) |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 71% (12/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (1/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.13 |
Aces Total | 57 | 36 |
DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.17 |
DFs Total | 11 | 48 |
Avg Match Time | 1:6:15 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 73.17 | 112.14 |
1st Serve % | 70% (376/537) | 66% (631/950) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (260/376) | 64% (403/631) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (83/161) | 50% (159/319) |
BPs Won% Total | 59% (19/32) | 42% (35/83) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (179/504) | 38% (325/858) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (6/6) | 68% (19/9) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (5/11) | 68% (19/28) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 50% (3/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (2/4) |
1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 95% (19/18) |
1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 5% (19/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Sean Hodkin Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Alexis Canter
Player
Sean Hodkin
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Emile Hudd
Player
Sean Hodkin
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sean Hodkin
Player
Tiran Sanghera
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
58
Total Points Won
56
|
6-7(5) 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sean Hodkin
Player
Naran Bahra
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
41%
(
16 of
39)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marcus Walters
Player
Sean Hodkin
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sean Hodkin
Player
David Quayle
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
13
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sean Hodkin
Player
Ying Hou
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Benjamin Pietri Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Diego Fernandez Flores
Player
Benjamin Pietri
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Pietri
Player
Marcel Zielinski
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
46
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Benjamin Pietri
Player
Sebastian Eriksson
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Benjamin Pietri
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 0-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more