Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sachia Vickery vs Nao Hibino Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vickery vs Hibino analysis and find out who is favored!
Sachia Vickery vs Nao Hibino Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vickery has won 46.36% of points on his second serve, while Hibino has won 44.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vickery, in recent form, has won 60.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hibino has won 54.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.29% and 36.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vickery has saved 52.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hibino has saved 53.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vickery has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 35/ 25), with Hibino winning 53.73% (W/L 36/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vickery has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 23/ 25). Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 43/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Vickery has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8), where as Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Vickery winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Vickery winning 4 and Hibino winning 3. The last match between Vickery and Hibino was at the French Open - Paris, 16-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vickery and Hibino have played a deciding set 1 times, with Vickery winning 1 times and Hibino 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Vickery winning 1, and Hibino 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vickery has played against opponents with an average rank of 240 while Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 197.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vickery has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hibino has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vickery has converted 48.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hibino has converted 48.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vickery 2 - 1 Hibino
129
Rank
73
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (382-292)
Career Total W/L
56% (368-295)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
52% (14-13)
$1,074,025
Career Prize Money
$1,225,315
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sachia Vickery | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 36 | 35 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 15 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:9 | 1:48:9 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (156/268) | 63% (143/227) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (90/156) | 50% (72/143) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (43/112) | 43% (36/84) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (19/42) | 46% (19/41) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (119/227) | 50% (135/268) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Sachia Vickery
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 7-5 5-7 7-6(5) |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Nao Hibino
60%
(
75 of
126)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
128)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
48%
(
61 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
63 of
128)
128
Total Points Won
126
|
||||
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Nao Hibino
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
84
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sachia Vickery | Nao Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 52% (14/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (35/24) | 49% (33/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (312/261) | 51% (309/299) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 55% (12/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:26 | 1:44:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 210.35 | 170.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1030/1915) | 67% (1335/1987) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (651/1030) | 62% (834/1335) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (408/885) | 46% (297/652) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (129/269) | 47% (109/231) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (934/1936) | 43% (867/1997) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 62% (8/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (10/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 52% (14/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 64% (9/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 33% (15/5) |
Sachia Vickery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Sachia Vickery
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Rebeka Masarova
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Sachia Vickery
55%
(
60 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
1
15
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Greetje Minnen
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Sachia Vickery
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Mccartney Kessler
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Lauren Davis
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Sachia Vickery
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Vickery Vs Hibino Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
