Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ruben Bemelmans vs Jordan Thompson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bemelmans vs Thompson analysis and find out who is favored!
Ruben Bemelmans vs Jordan Thompson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bemelmans has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Thompson has won 55.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bemelmans, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Thompson has won 47.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bemelmans has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thompson has saved 70.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bemelmans has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Thompson winning 59.15% (W/L 42/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bemelmans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 173/ 130), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 79/ 84). Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 38/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 86/ 62).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bemelmans winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Bemelmans winning 0 and Thompson winning 4. The last match between Bemelmans and Thompson was at the Eckental Challenger, 03-11-2021, Second, Carpet with Jordan Thompson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bemelmans and Thompson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bemelmans winning 0 times and Thompson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bemelmans winning 0, and Thompson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bemelmans has played against opponents with an average rank of while Thompson has played against players with an average rank of 162.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bemelmans has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thompson has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bemelmans has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thompson has converted 34.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bemelmans 0 - 2 Thompson
841
Rank
84
High
36
Age
L
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
33
Rank
32
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (552-419)
Career Total W/L
60% (444-295)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (16-11)
$1,013,488
Career Prize Money
$2,870,555
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Jordan Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 7 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:40 | 1:9:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (74/108) | 68% (54/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 50% (37/74) | 78% (42/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (15/34) | 54% (14/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (24/80) | 52% (56/108) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
Jordan Thompson
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
84%
(
36 of
43)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ruben Bemelmans | Jordan Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (16/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (38/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (345/332) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 158 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:15:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 150.7 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (1292/2140) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (924/1292) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (466/848) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (67/192) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (812/2206) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 68% (15/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (15/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 36% (11/4) |
Ruben Bemelmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Patten
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Daniel Little
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Michael Shaw
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ruben Bemelmans
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordan Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
82%
(
86 of
105)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
86)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
63%
(
84 of
133)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
108)
121
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Yibing Wu
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Jordan Thompson
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Jordan Thompson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Jordan Thompson
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Casper Ruud
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Bemelmans Vs Thompson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
