Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rosa VICENS MAS vs Suzan Lamens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our vs Lamens analysis and find out who is favored!
Rosa VICENS MAS vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lamens has won 43.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show , in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 57.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 42.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 55.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lamens winning 64.63% (W/L 53/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 227.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 50.13% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: 0 - 0 Lamens
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
VS Lamens H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rosa VICENS MAS | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 1st Match | 73% (24/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 63% (49/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 56% (399/309) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 80% (12/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 79% (11/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 1st Match | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 1st Match | 69 |
| DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 1st Match | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 240.12 |
| 1st Serve % | 1st Match | 61% (1277/2105) |
| 1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 64% (812/1277) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 45% (375/828) |
| BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 51% (145/287) |
| Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 48% (1022/2132) |
| Slam W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 1st Match | 100% (4/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 75% (18/6) |
| Futures W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 72% (23/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 91% (10/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 1st Match | 95% (20/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 1st Match | 5% (20/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 1st Match | 38% (13/5) |
Rosa VICENS MAS Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Salma Drugdova
Player
Rosa Vicens Mas
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rosa Vicens Mas
Player
Matilda Mutavdzic
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelie Smejkalova
Player
Rosa Vicens Mas
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
Player
Rosa Vicens Mas
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
52
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Rosa Vicens Mas
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Rosa Vicens Mas
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Dea Herdzelas
Player
Rosa Vicens Mas
53%
(
61 of
116)
1st Serve %
80%
(
77 of
96)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
53 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rosa Vicens Mas
Player
Eleni Christofi
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Rosa Vicens Mas
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
81%
(
59 of
73)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rosa Vicens Mas
Player
Nagi Hanatani
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ivana Sebestova
Player
Suzan Lamens
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Clara Tauson
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
49%
(
55 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
53
|
4-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Aliona Falei
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Julia Avdeeva
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Vs Lamens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
