Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ronald Hohmann vs Noah Schachter Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hohmann vs Schachter analysis and find out who is favored!
Ronald Hohmann vs Noah Schachter Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hohmann has won 46.15% of points on his second serve, while Schachter has won 47.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hohmann, in recent form, has won 41.18% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schachter has won 45.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 17.95% and 37.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hohmann has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schachter has saved 61.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hohmann has won 55% of matches played (W/L 11/ 9), with Schachter winning 52.54% (W/L 31/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hohmann has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 16/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 11/ 12). Schachter has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 20/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Hohmann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9), where as Schachter has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hohmann winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hohmann winning 1 and Schachter winning 2. The last match between Hohmann and Schachter was at the Canada F7 (Toronto), 09-09-2018, Q2 round, Hard with Noah Schachter getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hohmann and Schachter have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hohmann winning 0 times and Schachter 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hohmann winning 0, and Schachter 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hohmann has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.8 while Schachter has played against players with an average rank of 64.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hohmann has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schachter has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hohmann has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schachter has converted 39.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hohmann 0 - 1 Schachter
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
802
Rank
791
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
57% (56-43)
Career Total W/L
55% (87-70)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
39% (7-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ronald Hohmann | Noah Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ronald Hohmann | Noah Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 39% (7/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 41% (16/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (17/12) | 49% (183/191) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:20:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 39.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (40/53) | 60% (596/993) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (23/40) | 70% (420/596) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (6/13) | 48% (190/397) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/4) | 36% (37/102) |
| Return Pts W% | 25% (14/56) | 39% (380/966) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 27% (3/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 39% (7/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 10% (10/1) |
Ronald Hohmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Patrick Maloney
Player
Ronald Hohmann
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Ronald Hohmann
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Ronald Hohmann
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-7(7) 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Goodger
Player
Ronald Hohmann
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
16 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ronald Hohmann
Player
George Houghton
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ronald Hohmann
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Ronald Hohmann
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
17 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Schachter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Miles Jones
Player
Noah Schachter
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Yann Marti
Player
Noah Schachter
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Noah Schachter
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Jaycer Lyeons
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Joshua Muhire
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Noah Schachter
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Schachter
Player
Christopher Bulus
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hohmann Vs Schachter Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Noah Schachter
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
