Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Richard Gasquet vs Kenny De Schepper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gasquet vs Schepper analysis and find out who is favored!
Richard Gasquet vs Kenny De Schepper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gasquet has won 53.23% of points on his second serve, while Schepper has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gasquet, in recent form, has won 46.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schepper has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.38% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gasquet has saved 59.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schepper has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gasquet has won 47.06% of matches played (W/L 32/ 36), with Schepper winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gasquet has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 80/ 41), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 248/ 164). Schepper has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Gasquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.52% of matches (W/L 20/ 11), where as Schepper has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gasquet has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.68 while Schepper has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gasquet has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schepper has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gasquet has converted 39.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schepper has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gasquet 0 - 0 Schepper
N/A
Rank
High
37
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Richard Gasquet | Kenny De Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (16/15) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (36/34) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (347/337) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 106 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 66 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:52 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 280.9 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1294/2162) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (918/1294) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (462/868) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (71/181) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (781/2147) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (9/5) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (16/30) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 1st Match |
Richard Gasquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Richard Gasquet
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Richard Gasquet
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Adrian Mannarino
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Harold Mayot
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Richard Gasquet
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
9
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Stefano Napolitano
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Richard Gasquet
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Dominic Thiem
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Kenny De Schepper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Kenny de Schepper
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Luc Fomba
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
33 of
39)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
15 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Matthew Hulme
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Weber
Player
Kenny de Schepper
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Kenny de Schepper
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Kenny de Schepper
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Altug Celikbilek
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
8
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
52 of
72)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Robin Bertrand
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Kenny de Schepper
75%
(
77 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
2
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
52 of
65)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
28 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
29 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gasquet Vs Schepper Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
