Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Riccardo Bonadio vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bonadio vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Riccardo Bonadio vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bonadio 4 - 2 Fatic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bonadio has won 50.81% of points on their second serve, while Fatic has won 48.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bonadio, in recent form, has won 52.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 44.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.1% and 31.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bonadio has saved 61.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 60.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bonadio has won 45.28% of matches played (W/L 24/ 29), with Fatic winning 50.77% (W/L 33/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bonadio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 376/ 280), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bonadio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 26), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Bonadio winning 4 times and Fatic being victorious 2 times. They have played 14 sets in total, with Bonadio winning 9 and Fatic winning 5. The last match between Bonadio and Fatic was at the Barletta Challenger, 02-04-2024, First, Clay with Riccardo Bonadio getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bonadio and Fatic have played a deciding set 2 times, with Bonadio winning 1 times and Fatic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bonadio winning 0, and Fatic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bonadio has played against opponents with an average rank of 298.32 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 274.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bonadio has won 28% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bonadio has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 38.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
362
Rank
164
High
30
Age
R
Plays
4
Total2
0
Hard0
4
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
198
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (448-339)
Career Total W/L
57% (343-258)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
40% (10-15)
$158,415
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Riccardo Bonadio vs Nerman Fatic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bonadio VS Fatic
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Riccardo Bonadio | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 9 | 5 |
| Games Won | 73 | 57 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 18 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:37 | 1:50:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (268/436) | 62% (256/412) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (163/268) | 63% (162/256) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (94/168) | 43% (67/156) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (27/52) | 40% (19/48) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (183/412) | 41% (179/436) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 5-7 7-6(7) 6-4 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
107)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-5 1-6 6-1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Riccardo Bonadio | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 40% (10/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (32/28) | 44% (25/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (300/286) | 47% (257/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 33% (6/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 72 | 100 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:14 | 1:38:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 245.2 | 302.16 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1089/1768) | 65% (1041/1605) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (730/1089) | 68% (709/1041) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (345/679) | 49% (275/564) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (76/171) | 39% (51/132) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (712/1773) | 36% (589/1620) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (12/11) | 39% (7/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (13/25) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 8% (13/1) |
Riccardo Bonadio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Federico Bondioli
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Gianluca Mager
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Pietro Lavoratori
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
7 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Marcello Serafini
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Bonadio Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bonadio are available here and Fatic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
