Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rebeka Masarova vs Dejana Radanovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masarova vs Radanovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Rebeka Masarova vs Dejana Radanovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Masarova 0 - 0 Radanovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masarova has won 41.72% of points on their second serve, while Radanovic has won 41.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masarova, in recent form, has won 51.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Radanovic has won 57.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.8% and 38.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masarova has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radanovic has saved 54.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masarova has won 48.21% of matches played (W/L 27/ 29), with Radanovic winning 64.81% (W/L 35/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masarova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 130/ 65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Radanovic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 34/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Masarova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 12/ 7), where as Radanovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.04% of matches (W/L 35/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masarova has played against opponents with an average rank of 164.48 while Radanovic has played against players with an average rank of 333.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masarova has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radanovic has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masarova has converted 43.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radanovic has converted 50.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
109
Rank
62
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
251
Rank
187
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
64% (224-126)
Career Total W/L
61% (331-211)
47% (18-20)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$897,227
Career Prize Money
$12,023
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Rebeka Masarova vs Dejana Radanovic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Masarova VS Radanovic
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rebeka Masarova | Dejana Radanovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (18/20) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (46/47) | 51% (22/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (451/448) | 52% (207/194) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 186 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 162 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:42 | 1:46:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 170.68 | 346.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1878/3053) | 62% (840/1353) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1252/1878) | 63% (530/840) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (492/1175) | 42% (213/513) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (134/309) | 51% (83/163) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1180/2821) | 46% (591/1293) |
| Slam W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (10/6) | 53% (10/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (17/36) | 59% (10/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 39% (7/18) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 63% (19/12) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 32% (19/6) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 26% (19/5) | 17% (12/2) |
Rebeka Masarova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Rebeka Masarova
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Rebeka Masarova
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Sara Bejlek
62%
(
77 of
125)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
113)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
46 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
125
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Lena Papadakis
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Rebeka Masarova
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marketa Vondrousova
Player
Rebeka Masarova
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Rebeka Masarova
43%
(
6 of
14)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
17
Total Points Won
11
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Anna Bondar
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Francesca Jones
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
75 of
104)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 6-6 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Dejana Radanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Dejana Radanovic
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Dejana Radanovic
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
37
Total Points Won
35
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Xiyu Wang
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
1
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Dejana Radanovic
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Tatiana Pieri
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Dejana Radanovic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Alina Granwehr
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dejana Radanovic
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Dejana Radanovic
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Masarova Vs Radanovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Masarova are available here and Radanovic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
