Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Razvan Baiant vs Ben Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baiant vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Razvan Baiant vs Ben Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baiant has won 50.8% of points on his second serve, while Jones has won 49.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baiant, in recent form, has won 52.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 50.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.28% and 25.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baiant has saved 48.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 63.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baiant has won 56.6% of matches played (W/L 30/ 23), with Jones winning 40.74% (W/L 22/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baiant has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 31/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 23/ 32). Jones has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 56/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Baiant has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23), where as Jones has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.3% of matches (W/L 19/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Baiant winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Baiant winning 0 and Jones winning 2. The last match between Baiant and Jones was at the Belarus F3 (Minsk), 20-08-2018, Q3, Hard with Ben Jones getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baiant and Jones have played a deciding set 0 times, with Baiant winning 0 times and Jones 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Baiant winning 0, and Jones 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baiant has played against opponents with an average rank of 11.53 while Jones has played against players with an average rank of 103.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baiant has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baiant has converted 50.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 34.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Baiant 0 - 1 Jones
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
863
Rank
863
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
47% (59-67)
Career Total W/L
50% (133-135)
61% (19-12)
YTD W/L
54% (15-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Razvan Baiant | Ben Jones |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 3 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 40% (17/43) | 63% (31/49) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 74% (23/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 31% (8/26) | 61% (11/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (15/49) | 60% (26/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Ben Jones
Player
Razvan Baiant
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Razvan Baiant | Ben Jones |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (19/12) | 54% (15/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (40/29) | 53% (34/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (351/305) | 52% (335/307) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 57% (8/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.79 |
| Aces Total | 14 | 249 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 9.45 | 96.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (730/1041) | 71% (1169/1650) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (402/730) | 77% (902/1169) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (158/311) | 49% (237/481) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (65/129) | 31% (44/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (510/1109) | 34% (621/1802) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (19/12) | 56% (14/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (19/31) | 54% (15/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 40% (6/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 17% (12/2) |
Razvan Baiant Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Razvan Baiant
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Razvan Baiant
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | bye | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Borys Zgola
Player
Razvan Baiant
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Razvan Baiant
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Ben Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Ben Jones
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Ben Jones
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Philippov
Player
Ben Jones
70%
(
74 of
106)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
7
Aces
19
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Ben Jones
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
8
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Adam Majchrzak
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Mees Rottgering
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
19
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
57 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
10 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Ben Jones
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomasz Berkieta
Player
Ben Jones
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
15 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Jones
Player
Gabriele Bosio
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
22
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
54 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Baiant Vs Jones Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
