Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Qiang Wang vs Agnieszka Radwanska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Radwanska analysis and find out who is favored!
Qiang Wang vs Agnieszka Radwanska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 44.75% of points on his second serve, while Radwanska has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 53.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Radwanska has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.18% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 56.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radwanska has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 78.57% of matches played (W/L 11/ 3), with Radwanska winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 308/ 186), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 36). Radwanska has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 361/ 138), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 61/ 45).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 84.62% of matches (W/L 11/ 2), where as Radwanska has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Wang winning 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Wang winning 0 and Radwanska winning 8. The last match between Wang and Radwanska was at the Miami Open - Miami, 23-03-2017, Second, Hard with Agnieszka Radwanska getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Radwanska have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wang winning 0 times and Radwanska 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Radwanska 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.43 while Radwanska has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radwanska has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 49.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radwanska has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wang 0 - 4 Radwanska
573
Rank
12
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total4
0
Hard4
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
2
High
35
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
60% (412-279)
Career Total W/L
69% (596-267)
79% (11-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,853,637
Career Prize Money
$17,254,264
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Qiang Wang | Agnieszka Radwanska |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 8 |
| Games Won | 18 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 14 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:58 | 1:16:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (150/236) | 62% (144/233) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (82/150) | 69% (100/144) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (31/86) | 53% (47/89) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 18% (4/22) | 58% (19/33) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (86/233) | 52% (123/236) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/4) | 100% (4/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-1 |
Stats 
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Qiang Wang
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Qiang Wang
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Qiang Wang
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
41 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Qiang Wang | Agnieszka Radwanska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 74% (23/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (154/118) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:47 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 208.43 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (504/828) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (322/504) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (145/324) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (60/122) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (416/847) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 85% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 77% (10/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Sijia Wei
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F | 1-6 6-3 4-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Xiaodi You
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
44%
(
41 of
93)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
52%
(
51 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Rutuja Bhosale
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Ayumi Koshiishi
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
52 of
90)
77
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Qiang Wang
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Wushuang Zheng
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
En Shuo Liang
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Agnieszka Radwanska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Agnieszka Radwanska
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Agnieszka Radwanska
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Kvitova
Player
Agnieszka Radwanska
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Agnieszka Radwanska
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucie Safarova
Player
Agnieszka Radwanska
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
70%
(
86 of
122)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
11
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
17 of
53)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
50 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
125
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Agnieszka Radwanska
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
52%
(
50 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Agnieszka Radwanska
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Wang Vs Radwanska Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Qiang Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
