Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Petra Martic vs Susan Bandecchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martic vs Bandecchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Petra Martic vs Susan Bandecchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martic has won 45.28% of points on his second serve, while Bandecchi has won 45.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martic, in recent form, has won 50.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bandecchi has won 57.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.79% and 40.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martic has saved 53.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bandecchi has saved 51.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martic has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 15/ 20), with Bandecchi winning 47.46% (W/L 28/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 170/ 96), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 165/ 151). Bandecchi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Martic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8), where as Bandecchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.98% of matches (W/L 24/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Martic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Martic winning 2 and Bandecchi winning 0. The last match between Martic and Bandecchi was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 08-05-2022, Q3, Clay with Petra Martic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Martic and Bandecchi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Martic winning 0 times and Bandecchi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Martic winning 0, and Bandecchi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martic has played against opponents with an average rank of 98.2 while Bandecchi has played against players with an average rank of 345.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martic has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bandecchi has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martic has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bandecchi has converted 47.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Martic 1 - 0 Bandecchi
81
Rank
14
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
371
Rank
164
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (420-315)
Career Total W/L
57% (256-191)
33% (4-8)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$5,622,563
Career Prize Money
$93,621
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Petra Martic | Susan Bandecchi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (32/50) | 76% (42/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (24/32) | 52% (22/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (8/18) | 31% (4/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (29/55) | 36% (18/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Petra Martic
Player
Susan Bandecchi
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Petra Martic | Susan Bandecchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (4/8) | 50% (9/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (11/18) | 48% (22/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (134/151) | 52% (220/205) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:40 | 1:58:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 103.58 | 404.06 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (530/901) | 72% (934/1292) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (367/530) | 60% (556/934) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (168/371) | 45% (162/358) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (36/81) | 48% (85/176) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (361/929) | 48% (629/1322) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (4/12) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 20% (10/2) |
Petra Martic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Petra Martic
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Petra Martic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelique Kerber
Player
Petra Martic
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Petra Martic
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Caroline Dolehide
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Petra Martic
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Martic
Player
Arantxa Rus
55%
(
59 of
107)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
115
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Petra Martic
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
2
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Petra Martic
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
120)
7
Aces
11
10
Double Faults
7
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Petra Martic
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Susan Bandecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Susan Bandecchi
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
53%
(
47 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Fiona Ganz
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Susan Bandecchi
72%
(
86 of
120)
1st Serve %
73%
(
88 of
120)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
48%
(
58 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
120
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Nika Radisic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Susan Bandecchi
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Panna Udvardy
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Julia Avdeeva
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Susan Bandecchi
72%
(
65 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Elena Korokozidi
82%
(
77 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
47 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Susan Bandecchi
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Martic Vs Bandecchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Petra Martic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
