Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pedro Cachin vs Tristan Lamasine Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cachin vs Lamasine analysis and find out who is favored!
Pedro Cachin vs Tristan Lamasine Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cachin has won 42.82% of points on his second serve, while Lamasine has won 49.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cachin, in recent form, has won 46.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamasine has won 51.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.94% and 32.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cachin has saved 47.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamasine has saved 55.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cachin has won 42% of matches played (W/L 21/ 29), with Lamasine winning 68.24% (W/L 58/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cachin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 407/ 238), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Lamasine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 173/ 153).
- Player level: In the last year, Cachin has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 35% of matches (W/L 7/ 13), where as Lamasine has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cachin winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Cachin winning 4 and Lamasine winning 0. The last match between Cachin and Lamasine was at the Milan Challenger, 23-06-2021, Second, Clay with Pedro Cachin getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cachin and Lamasine have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cachin winning 0 times and Lamasine 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cachin winning 0, and Lamasine 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cachin has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.1 while Lamasine has played against players with an average rank of 240.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cachin has won 32% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamasine has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cachin has converted 37.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamasine has converted 45.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cachin 2 - 0 Lamasine
91
Rank
48
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
285
Rank
181
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (431-285)
Career Total W/L
55% (420-339)
14% (2-12)
YTD W/L
58% (19-14)
$816,700
Career Prize Money
$160,780
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pedro Cachin | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:29 | 1:18:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (66/112) | 64% (73/114) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (49/66) | 56% (41/73) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (24/46) | 37% (15/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (10/18) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (58/114) | 35% (39/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Pedro Cachin
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Tristan Lamasine
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pedro Cachin | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 14% (2/12) | 58% (19/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 32% (12/26) | 54% (41/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (155/212) | 51% (385/368) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/9) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 51 | 105 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 92 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:1 | 1:45:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 150.71 | 221.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (675/1063) | 62% (1482/2377) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (436/675) | 69% (1027/1482) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (170/388) | 49% (441/895) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (29/79) | 45% (97/215) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (355/1005) | 40% (963/2425) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (19/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 15% (2/13) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 13% (1/8) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 33% (6/2) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 67% (6/4) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 20% (15/3) |
Pedro Cachin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Pedro Cachin
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
122)
109
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Frances Tiafoe
64%
(
70 of
110)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
103)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Sebastian Ofner
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Pedro Cachin
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Pedro Cachin
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Pedro Cachin
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Pedro Cachin
64%
(
86 of
135)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
119
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Pedro Cachin
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Pedro Cachin
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
106)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Tristan Lamasine
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Arthur Weber
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tristan Lamasine
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jiri Vesely
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Antoine Escoffier
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(9) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Lucas Poullain
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cachin Vs Lamasine Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
