Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Alejandro MORO Canas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ruiz vs Canas analysis and find out who is favored!
Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Alejandro MORO Canas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruiz has won 51.66% of points on his second serve, while Canas has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruiz, in recent form, has won 49.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Canas has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ruiz has saved 61.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Canas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ruiz has won 58.21% of matches played (W/L 39/ 28), with Canas winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ruiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 124/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Canas has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Ruiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 17), where as Canas has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.57 while Canas has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruiz has won 32% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Canas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruiz has converted 41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Canas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ruiz 0 - 0 Canas
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pablo Llamas Ruiz | Alejandro MORO Canas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (16/15) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (40/31) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (362/347) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 89 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.06 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 246.32 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1565/2287) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1062/1565) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (373/722) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (82/200) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (856/2274) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 62% (8/5) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (6/8) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (16/30) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (8/14) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (2/10) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (13/0) | 1st Match |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
55%
(
6 of
11)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
73%
(
72 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Federico Coria
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Quentin Halys
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Dominik Koepfer
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
7 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Alejandro MORO Canas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Vilius Gaubas
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Stefano Travaglia
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Zsombor Piros
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Dominic Thiem
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ruiz Vs Canas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
