Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Orlando Luz vs Matteo Gigante Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Luz vs Gigante analysis and find out who is favored!
Orlando Luz vs Matteo Gigante Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Luz has won 51.8% of points on his second serve, while Gigante has won 50.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Luz, in recent form, has won 48.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gigante has won 51.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.43% and 35.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Luz has saved 64.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gigante has saved 59.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Luz has won 56.45% of matches played (W/L 35/ 27), with Gigante winning 61.54% (W/L 40/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Luz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 305/ 179), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 40/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Luz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26), where as Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.31% of matches (W/L 35/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Luz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Luz winning 2 and Gigante winning 0. The last match between Luz and Gigante was at the M15 Antalya, 29-05-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Orlando Luz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Luz and Gigante have played a deciding set 0 times, with Luz winning 0 times and Gigante 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Luz winning 1, and Gigante 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Luz has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.39 while Gigante has played against players with an average rank of 298.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Luz has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gigante has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Luz has converted 40.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gigante has converted 46.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Luz 1 - 0 Gigante
359
Rank
272
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
139
Rank
139
High
22
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
61% (322-202)
Career Total W/L
59% (123-84)
54% (14-12)
YTD W/L
73% (22-8)
$2,945
Career Prize Money
$40,215
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Orlando Luz | Matteo Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:0 | 2:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (44/69) | 61% (59/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (30/44) | 66% (39/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (8/25) | 24% (9/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 24% (5/21) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (48/96) | 45% (31/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Orlando Luz
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
37)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Orlando Luz | Matteo Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (14/12) | 73% (22/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (36/31) | 63% (45/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (350/323) | 55% (356/293) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 86% (18/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 112 | 134 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.46 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 145 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:19 | 1:34:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.54 | 255.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1282/2214) | 61% (1250/2040) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (897/1282) | 70% (875/1250) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (482/932) | 51% (400/790) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (82/206) | 46% (102/220) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (810/2126) | 42% (857/2056) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (14/12) | 87% (20/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (14/26) | 73% (22/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 15% (2/13) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 47% (7/15) | 91% (10/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (14/9) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 36% (14/5) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 46% (13/6) |
Orlando Luz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Orlando Luz
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
13
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
91%
(
40 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Peter Heller
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Orlando Luz
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Orlando Luz
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Petr Brunclik
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Orlando Luz
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
9
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Orlando Luz
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Matteo Gigante
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rudolf Molleker
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Karim Bennani
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
45%
(
41 of
91)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve %
79%
(
27 of
34)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
7
Aces
10
11
Double Faults
3
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
114
|
1-6 7-6(0) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Luz Vs Gigante Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Matteo Gigante
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
