Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Omni Kumar vs Max Hans Rehberg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kumar vs Rehberg analysis and find out who is favored!
Omni Kumar vs Max Hans Rehberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kumar has won 54.01% of points on his second serve, while Rehberg has won 51.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kumar, in recent form, has won 57.27% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rehberg has won 50.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.08% and 29.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kumar has saved 54.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rehberg has saved 60.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kumar has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 51/ 30), with Rehberg winning 53.7% (W/L 29/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kumar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 234/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Rehberg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 40/ 15), where as Rehberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kumar winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kumar winning 2 and Rehberg winning 0. The last match between Kumar and Rehberg was at the M15 Monastir, 15-03-2022, First, Hard with Omni Kumar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kumar and Rehberg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kumar winning 0 times and Rehberg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kumar winning 1, and Rehberg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kumar has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.77 while Rehberg has played against players with an average rank of 157.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kumar has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rehberg has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kumar has converted 46.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rehberg has converted 38.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kumar 1 - 0 Rehberg
353
Rank
348
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
474
Rank
382
High
20
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
63% (245-144)
Career Total W/L
52% (71-66)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
63% (15-9)
$20,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Omni Kumar | Max Hans Rehberg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (38/68) | 64% (46/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (29/38) | 63% (29/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (32/72) | 32% (22/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Omni Kumar
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Omni Kumar | Max Hans Rehberg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 63% (15/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (32/23) | 59% (33/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (266/233) | 52% (297/272) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (14/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 102 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:41 | 1:53:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 245.71 | 103.54 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1112/1649) | 67% (1173/1763) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (709/1112) | 72% (842/1173) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (277/537) | 51% (303/590) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (80/168) | 38% (64/168) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (677/1582) | 37% (673/1826) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (13/7) | 72% (13/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 63% (15/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 53% (8/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 100% (11/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (11/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 31% (13/4) |
Omni Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Omni Kumar
38%
(
12 of
32)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kai Wehnelt
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Patrick Zahraj
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Omni Kumar
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
87%
(
52 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Omni Kumar
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Michele Ribecai
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Simon Beaupain
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kiyan Santino Kasemi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Hans Rehberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Julius Seifert
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Mikalai Haliak
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Neil Oberleitner
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Andriy Poritskyy
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
7%
(
2 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
7
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kumar Vs Rehberg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
