Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Neil Oberleitner vs Valentin DE Carvalho Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Oberleitner vs Carvalho analysis and find out who is favored!
Neil Oberleitner vs Valentin DE Carvalho Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Oberleitner has won 45.1% of points on his second serve, while Carvalho has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Oberleitner, in recent form, has won 53.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carvalho has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.99% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Oberleitner has saved 59.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carvalho has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Oberleitner has won 50% of matches played (W/L 35/ 35), with Carvalho winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Oberleitner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 71/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 12/ 13). Carvalho has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Oberleitner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58% of matches (W/L 29/ 21), where as Carvalho has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Oberleitner has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.99 while Carvalho has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Oberleitner has won 24% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carvalho has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Oberleitner has converted 44.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carvalho has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Oberleitner 0 - 0 Carvalho
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Oberleitner VS Carvalho H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Neil Oberleitner | Valentin DE Carvalho |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (39/28) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (344/307) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (7/8) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 141 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 83 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218.31 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1227/2003) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (907/1227) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (349/776) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (92/216) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (867/2111) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 63% (17/10) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 1st Match |
Neil Oberleitner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Mili Poljicak
Player
Neil Oberleitner
54%
(
59 of
109)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Luka Mikrut
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Attila Boros
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Tilen Kovac
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Neil Oberleitner
58%
(
68 of
118)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
11
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
44 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Paul Woerner
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Neil Oberleitner
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Mirza Basic
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Valentin DE Carvalho Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Luigi Sorrentino
Player
Valentin De Carvalho
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien De Cuyper
Player
Valentin De Carvalho
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julien De Cuyper
Player
Valentin De Carvalho
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
30%
(
6 of
20)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25
Total Points Won
16
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Oberleitner Vs Carvalho Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
