Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathan Ponwith vs Hunter Heck Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Heck analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Ponwith vs Hunter Heck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 52.71% of points on his second serve, while Heck has won 54.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 46.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Heck has won 59.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.89% and 38.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 56.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heck has saved 72.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 29.41% of matches played (W/L 15/ 36), with Heck winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 36/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Heck has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 17/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.88% of matches (W/L 7/ 25), where as Heck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ponwith winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 2 and Heck winning 0. The last match between Ponwith and Heck was at the M15 Champaign, 22-06-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Heck have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ponwith winning 0 times and Heck 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Heck 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.24 while Heck has played against players with an average rank of 203.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heck has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heck has converted 47.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ponwith 1 - 0 Heck
744
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
55% (166-134)
Career Total W/L
46% (24-28)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
75% (3-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Hunter Heck |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathan Ponwith | Hunter Heck |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 75% (3/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 37% (16/27) | 75% (6/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (187/222) | 67% (41/20) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 241.32 | 227.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (779/1355) | 65% (110/170) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (494/779) | 67% (74/110) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (301/576) | 55% (33/60) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (43/107) | 53% (10/19) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (483/1284) | 44% (68/154) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 42% (5/7) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 37% (7/19) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
15
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(0) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hunter Heck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hunter Heck
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Jaimee Floyd Angele
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenta Miyoshi
Player
Hunter Heck
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Oliver Okonkwo
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Ezekiel Clark
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Hunter Heck
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Axel Nefve
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hunter Heck
Player
Andrew Fenty
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Ponwith Vs Heck Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
