Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natasha Subhash vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subhash vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!
Natasha Subhash vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subhash has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mandlik has won 45.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subhash, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 56.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subhash has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 51.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subhash has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mandlik winning 54.24% (W/L 32/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subhash has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 26/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Subhash winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Subhash winning 0 and Mandlik winning 2. The last match between Subhash and Mandlik was at the W15 Arcadia, 16-03-2019, Semifinals, Hard with Elizabeth Mandlik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subhash and Mandlik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Subhash winning 0 times and Mandlik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Subhash winning 0, and Mandlik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subhash has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 194.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subhash has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subhash has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 52.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Subhash 0 - 1 Mandlik
Ret.
Rank
382
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
142
Rank
97
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
67% (49-24)
Career Total W/L
57% (146-112)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
27% (3-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$316,750
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Natasha Subhash | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (46/72) | 53% (36/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (26/46) | 69% (25/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 27% (7/26) | 34% (11/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (32/68) | 54% (39/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Natasha Subhash
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natasha Subhash | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (3/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (9/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (109/130) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 154.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (428/759) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (252/428) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (138/331) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 53% (46/86) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (335/750) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 27% (3/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Natasha Subhash Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Dolehide
Player
Natasha Subhash
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natasha Subhash
Player
Johanna Larsson
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
6 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natasha Subhash
Player
Giuliana Olmos
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
53
|
2-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Natasha Subhash
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Deniz Khazaniuk
Player
Natasha Subhash
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natasha Subhash
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natasha Subhash
Player
Amy Zhu
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natasha Subhash
Player
Elizabeth Coleman
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Claire Liu
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jessika Ponchet
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Subhash Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
