Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natalia Siedliska vs Lisa Pigato Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siedliska vs Pigato analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalia Siedliska vs Lisa Pigato Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siedliska has won 39.66% of points on his second serve, while Pigato has won 46.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siedliska, in recent form, has won 60.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pigato has won 58.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.24% and 41.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siedliska has saved 62.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pigato has saved 57.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siedliska has won 60.98% of matches played (W/L 25/ 16), with Pigato winning 52.73% (W/L 29/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siedliska has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 10/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Pigato has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 22/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Siedliska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 12/ 11), where as Pigato has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.83% of matches (W/L 28/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Siedliska winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Siedliska winning 2 and Pigato winning 3. The last match between Siedliska and Pigato was at the W60 Olomouc, 18-07-2023, First, Clay with Natalia Siedliska getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siedliska and Pigato have played a deciding set 1 times, with Siedliska winning 1 times and Pigato 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Siedliska winning 0, and Pigato 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siedliska has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.24 while Pigato has played against players with an average rank of 297.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siedliska has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pigato has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siedliska has converted 44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pigato has converted 52.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Siedliska 1 - 1 Pigato
656
Rank
487
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
337
Rank
337
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
57% (249-191)
Career Total W/L
56% (135-104)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$14,809
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Natalia Siedliska | Lisa Pigato |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 23 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:0 | 2:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (119/195) | 66% (93/140) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (66/119) | 59% (55/93) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (36/76) | 51% (24/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 69% (9/13) | 44% (11/25) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (61/140) | 48% (93/195) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Lisa Pigato
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(7) |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Natalia Siedliska
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natalia Siedliska | Lisa Pigato |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 57% (8/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) | 55% (18/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (67/77) | 54% (168/145) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 62% (8/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:42 | 2:12:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 84.86 | 322.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (374/537) | 71% (780/1097) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (212/374) | 56% (440/780) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 37% (60/163) | 46% (147/317) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (28/69) | 55% (74/135) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (224/482) | 48% (492/1022) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 57% (8/6) |
| Futures W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 57% (8/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Natalia Siedliska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ella Haavisto
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
3
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
2
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Yasmine Wagner
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Sevcikova
Player
Natalia Siedliska
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Natalia Siedliska
78%
(
76 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
74 of
99)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yifan Sun
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Tamara Curovic
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Zhanel Rustemova
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
39%
(
18 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Natalia Siedliska
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Pigato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Lisa Pigato
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Oleksandra Oliynykova
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
84%
(
37 of
44)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Tatiana Pieri
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Monique Barry
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Lisa Pigato
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
83%
(
79 of
95)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
48 of
79)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Lisa Pigato
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
38 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Paula Ormaechea
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
43%
(
21 of
49)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
39 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Arianna Zucchini
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Siedliska Vs Pigato Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
