Naoki Tajima vs Daniele Catini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tajima vs Catini analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoki Tajima vs Daniele Catini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tajima has won 48.12% of points on his second serve, while Catini has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tajima, in recent form, has won 49.12% of his opponent's second serve points, while Catini has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tajima has saved 59.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Catini has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tajima has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 30/ 27), with Catini winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Catini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 30/ 31), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 15/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.72% of matches (W/L 29/ 24), where as Catini has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tajima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tajima winning 2 and Catini winning 0. The last match between Tajima and Catini was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 09-10-2019, First, Hard with Naoki Tajima getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tajima and Catini have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tajima winning 0 times and Catini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tajima winning 0, and Catini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tajima has played against opponents with an average rank of 94.89 while Catini has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tajima has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Catini has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tajima has converted 47.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Catini has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tajima 1 - 0 Catini
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (117-128)
Career Total W/L
45% (45-54)
50% (13-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Naoki Tajima | Daniele Catini |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (30/48) | 69% (34/49) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 65% (22/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 78% (14/18) | 40% (6/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
Return Points W% | 43% (21/49) | 23% (11/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Naoki Tajima
Player
Daniele Catini
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naoki Tajima | Daniele Catini |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (13/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (33/28) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (299/260) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
Aces Total | 70 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.31 | 0 |
DFs Total | 85 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:23:29 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 78.65 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (762/1310) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (527/762) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (257/548) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (73/155) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (603/1385) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 54% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Kanan Gasimov
Player
Naoki Tajima
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve %
38%
(
6 of
16)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
27
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Andrin Casanova
Player
Naoki Tajima
53%
(
48 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Tajima
Player
Mubarak Shannan Zayid
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Tajima
Player
Fedor Sosedkin
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Naoki Tajima
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jesse Delaney
Player
Naoki Tajima
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sam Oster
Player
Naoki Tajima
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H |
view more
Daniele Catini Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 2-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Naoki Tajima
Player
Daniele Catini
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniele Catini
Player
Davide Albertoni
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-7(4) 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alessandro Bega
Player
Daniele Catini
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more