Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Grace Min Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Min analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Grace Min Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 44.63% of points on his second serve, while Min has won 47.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Min has won 51.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.85% and 36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 53.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Min has saved 42.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 53.73% of matches played (W/L 36/ 31), with Min winning 47.83% (W/L 22/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 43/ 51). Min has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 180/ 105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9), where as Min has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hibino winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Hibino winning 3 and Min winning 2. The last match between Hibino and Min was at the W60 Charlottesville, 26-04-2023, First, Clay with Grace Min getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Min have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hibino winning 0 times and Min 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Min 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.48 while Min has played against players with an average rank of 179.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Min has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 48.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Min has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 1 Min
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
310
Rank
97
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
56% (368-295)
Career Total W/L
56% (370-287)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-5)
$1,225,315
Career Prize Money
$378,404
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nao Hibino | Grace Min |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:30 | 2:3:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (103/163) | 68% (92/136) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (63/103) | 51% (47/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (30/60) | 45% (20/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (11/19) | 39% (7/18) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (69/136) | 43% (70/163) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Grace Min
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
110)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Grace Min
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
27 of
35)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Grace Min |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 0% (0/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (33/35) | 9% (1/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (309/299) | 32% (30/63) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:44 | 1:35:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 170.41 | 116.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1335/1987) | 69% (207/300) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (834/1335) | 50% (103/207) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (297/652) | 42% (39/93) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (109/231) | 38% (10/26) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (867/1997) | 37% (112/303) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 0% (0/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (15/5) | 0% (4/0) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Grace Min Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Grace Min
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Grace Min
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Grace Min
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Grace Min
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexa Noel
Player
Grace Min
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ellie Douglas
Player
Grace Min
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grace Min
Player
Gabriela Lee
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
76%
(
52 of
68)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Grace Min
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grace Min
Player
Allie Kiick
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
15
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
52%
(
36 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Grace Min
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Min Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
