Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Sasnovich analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 44.63% of points on his second serve, while Sasnovich has won 41.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sasnovich has won 56.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.85% and 36.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 53.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sasnovich has saved 53.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Sasnovich winning 47.17% (W/L 25/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 43/ 51). Sasnovich has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 98/ 47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 19/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 55% of matches (W/L 11/ 9), where as Sasnovich has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hibino winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Hibino winning 2 and Sasnovich winning 3. The last match between Hibino and Sasnovich was at the Wimbledon - London, 01-07-2021, Second, Grass with Aliaksandra Sasnovich getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Sasnovich have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hibino winning 1 times and Sasnovich 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Sasnovich 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.33 while Sasnovich has played against players with an average rank of 159.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sasnovich has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 48.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sasnovich has converted 46.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 1 Sasnovich
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
109
Rank
29
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
56% (368-295)
Career Total W/L
59% (403-281)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
37% (7-12)
$1,225,315
Career Prize Money
$3,636,750
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nao Hibino | Aliaksandra Sasnovich |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 27 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:0 | 0:49:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (44/70) | 66% (54/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (28/44) | 61% (33/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (9/26) | 50% (14/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (35/82) | 47% (33/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| w/o | |||||
| 6-2 5-7 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Aliaksandra Sasnovich |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 37% (7/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (33/35) | 40% (18/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (309/299) | 48% (207/227) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 36% (5/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.27 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 57 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.51 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:44 | 1:43:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 170.41 | 246.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1335/1987) | 60% (864/1431) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (834/1335) | 62% (533/864) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (297/652) | 41% (233/567) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (109/231) | 46% (79/170) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (867/1997) | 44% (631/1440) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 62% (8/5) | 17% (1/5) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 37% (7/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (15/5) | 9% (11/1) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Nao Hibino
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Aliaksandra Sasnovich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
47%
(
39 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
32%
(
14 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
55%
(
46 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
56 of
107)
93
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Oceane Dodin
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
66 of
103)
8
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Jana Fett
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Kayla Day
49%
(
51 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
91 of
134)
12
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
9
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
56 of
91)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
65 of
134)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
23%
(
5 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
49%
(
29 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Sasnovich Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
