Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Monica Puig vs Jelena Ostapenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Puig vs Ostapenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Monica Puig vs Jelena Ostapenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Puig has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ostapenko has won 44.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Puig, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ostapenko has won 59.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Puig has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ostapenko has saved 56.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Puig has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ostapenko winning 68.18% (W/L 45/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Puig has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 32/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 49% (W/L 17/ 18). Ostapenko has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 48/ 21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 136/ 107).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Puig winning 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Puig winning 1 and Ostapenko winning 6. The last match between Puig and Ostapenko was at the Wuhan Tennis Open - Wuhan, 27-09-2017, Third, Hard with Jelena Ostapenko getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:34.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Puig and Ostapenko have played a deciding set 1 times, with Puig winning 0 times and Ostapenko 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Puig winning 0, and Ostapenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Puig has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ostapenko has played against players with an average rank of 113.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Puig has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ostapenko has won 72% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Puig has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ostapenko has converted 44.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Puig 0 - 3 Ostapenko
786
Rank
27
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total3
0
Hard1
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
10
Rank
5
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
58% (302-218)
Career Total W/L
63% (382-229)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (22-9)
$2,050,916
Career Prize Money
$10,156,982
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Monica Puig | Jelena Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 6 |
| Games Won | 18 | 39 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 20 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:34 | 1:20:34 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (114/191) | 50% (88/175) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (71/114) | 81% (71/88) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (30/77) | 55% (48/87) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 43% (13/30) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (56/175) | 47% (90/191) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Monica Puig
42%
(
31 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
11
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Monica Puig
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Monica Puig
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Monica Puig | Jelena Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (22/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (46/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (366/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (13/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 128 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:27:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 142.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (1144/1957) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (790/1144) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (360/813) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (109/246) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (885/1984) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 85% (11/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (22/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (12/4) |
Monica Puig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Monica Puig
50%
(
11 of
22)
1st Serve %
64%
(
7 of
11)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
6 of
11)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
18
Total Points Won
15
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Monica Puig
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Monica Puig
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Margarita Betova
Player
Monica Puig
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
7
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Monica Puig
66%
(
82 of
124)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
3
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
6
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
61 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Goerges
Player
Monica Puig
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jelena Ostapenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Anastasia Potapova
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Laura Siegemund
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
84%
(
64 of
76)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Puig Vs Ostapenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
