Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mirza Basic vs Jack Draper Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Basic vs Draper analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirza Basic vs Jack Draper Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Basic has won 53.37% of points on his second serve, while Draper has won 51.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Basic, in recent form, has won 49.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Draper has won 51.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.82% and 30.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Basic has saved 53.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Draper has saved 65.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Basic has won 56.82% of matches played (W/L 25/ 19), with Draper winning 66.07% (W/L 37/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 140/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20). Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 18/ 11), where as Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68% of matches (W/L 17/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Basic winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Basic winning 1 and Draper winning 4. The last match between Basic and Draper was at the Forli 5 Challenger, 26-02-2022, Semifinals, I.hard with Jack Draper getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Basic and Draper have played a deciding set 1 times, with Basic winning 0 times and Draper 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Basic winning 1, and Draper 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Basic has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.5 while Draper has played against players with an average rank of 160.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Basic has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Draper has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Basic has converted 38.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Draper has converted 51.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Basic 0 - 2 Draper
711
Rank
74
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor2
0
Grass0
43
Rank
37
High
22
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
56% (467-364)
Career Total W/L
69% (201-91)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$478,883
Career Prize Money
$1,438,075
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mirza Basic | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 17 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 20 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:15 | 1:31:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (97/136) | 60% (82/136) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (68/97) | 87% (71/82) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (17/39) | 48% (26/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 47% (8/17) |
| Return Points W% | 29% (39/136) | 38% (51/136) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Mirza Basic
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
13
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Mirza Basic
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
47 of
60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mirza Basic | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (22/18) | 57% (33/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (208/195) | 54% (298/250) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.56 |
| Aces Total | 71 | 151 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:27 | 2:5:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 93.79 | 101.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (842/1243) | 58% (975/1679) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (592/842) | 76% (740/975) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (214/401) | 50% (353/704) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (44/115) | 51% (73/144) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (500/1333) | 38% (633/1663) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 61% (11/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 71% (14/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 29% (14/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Josip Simundza
Player
Mirza Basic
71%
(
92 of
129)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
38%
(
49 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
109
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Marin Bradaric
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
85%
(
22 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
25
Total Points Won
19
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mirza Basic
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Alen Bill
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Mirza Basic
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
65%
(
81 of
124)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
60 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
37 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
124)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sean Hess
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Mili Poljicak
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
20 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Marino Jakic
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
49 of
96)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Mirza Basic
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Mirza Basic
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
18
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Jack Draper
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jack Draper
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Basic Vs Draper Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
