Mirza Basic vs Aleksa Pisaric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Basic vs Pisaric analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirza Basic vs Aleksa Pisaric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Basic 0 - 0 Pisaric
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Basic has won 53.12% of points on their second serve, while Pisaric has won 47.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Basic, in recent form, has won 50.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pisaric has won 54.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.14% and 35.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Basic has saved 60.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pisaric has saved 44.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Basic has won 56.52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 20), with Pisaric winning 54.84% (W/L 17/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 140/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20). Pisaric has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 20/ 12), where as Pisaric has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.84% of matches (W/L 17/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Basic has played against opponents with an average rank of 249.24 while Pisaric has played against players with an average rank of 55.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Basic has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pisaric has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Basic has converted 41.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pisaric has converted 38.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
592
Rank
74
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Form
56% (476-368)
Career Total W/L
39% (19-30)
59% (19-13)
YTD W/L
65% (13-7)
$478,883
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Mirza Basic vs Aleksa Pisaric For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Basic VS Pisaric
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mirza Basic | Aleksa Pisaric |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 59% (19/13) | 65% (13/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (41/27) | 62% (28/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (359/308) | 55% (235/195) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 71% (5/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) | 62% (8/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.16 |
Aces Total | 112 | 34 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 38 | 26 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:38 | 1:4:39 |
Avg Opp Rank | 163.63 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1357/2046) | 57% (448/782) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (970/1357) | 66% (294/448) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (366/689) | 48% (159/334) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (86/205) | 39% (36/93) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (860/2175) | 43% (349/818) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 64% (18/10) | 65% (13/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 65% (13/20) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 60% (3/5) |
1st set W, W | 86% (22/19) | 92% (13/12) |
1st set W, L | 14% (22/3) | 8% (13/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
Player
Mirza Basic
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Jakub Paul
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Jay Clarke
53%
(
55 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Buvaysar Gadamauri
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Lenny Petit
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Luka Mikrut
Player
Mirza Basic
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Filip Krolo
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Andrew Paulson
Player
Mirza Basic
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Aleksa Pisaric Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vuk Radjenovic
Player
Aleksa Pisaric
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
47%
(
28 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
51 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Andrej Nedic
Player
Aleksa Pisaric
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksa Pisaric
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Aleksa Pisaric
Player
David Naharro
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-7(7) 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Aleksa Pisaric
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Boris Butulija
Player
Aleksa Pisaric
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
46
Total Points Won
49
|
0-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Viktor Jovic
Player
Aleksa Pisaric
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aleksa Pisaric
Player
Emilien Demanet
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 10-7 | H2H |
view more
Basic Vs Pisaric Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Basic are available here and Pisaric photos here.
![Basic Pisaric H2h Summary Stats 1st July 2024 Basic Pisaric H2h Summary Stats 1st July 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Mirza-Basic-Aleksa-Pisaric-h2h-profile.webp)
![Mirza Basic Aleksa Pisaric Prediction Stats Mirza Basic Aleksa Pisaric Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Mirza-Basic-Aleksa-Pisaric-h2h-stats.webp)