Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Miriana Tona vs Eliessa Vanlangendonck Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tona vs Vanlangendonck analysis and find out who is favored!
Miriana Tona vs Eliessa Vanlangendonck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tona has won 44.67% of points on his second serve, while Vanlangendonck has won 46.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tona, in recent form, has won 57.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vanlangendonck has won 59.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.76% and 44.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tona has saved 57.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vanlangendonck has saved 49.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tona has won 59.68% of matches played (W/L 37/ 25), with Vanlangendonck winning 64.58% (W/L 31/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tona has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 140/ 113), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 36/ 33). Vanlangendonck has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 144/ 95), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 16/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Tona has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 36/ 24), where as Vanlangendonck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.71% of matches (W/L 23/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tona winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tona winning 2 and Vanlangendonck winning 1. The last match between Tona and Vanlangendonck was at the Monastir, 09-11-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Miriana Tona getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tona and Vanlangendonck have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tona winning 1 times and Vanlangendonck 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tona winning 0, and Vanlangendonck 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tona has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.32 while Vanlangendonck has played against players with an average rank of 170.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tona has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vanlangendonck has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tona has converted 45.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vanlangendonck has converted 54.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tona 1 - 0 Vanlangendonck
325
Rank
325
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
668
Rank
617
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
54% (193-164)
Career Total W/L
58% (293-209)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
65% (15-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tona VS Vanlangendonck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Miriana Tona | Eliessa Vanlangendonck |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:0 | 2:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (59/101) | 62% (60/97) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (45/59) | 65% (39/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (14/42) | 41% (15/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 21% (3/14) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (43/97) | 42% (42/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Tona VS Vanlangendonck H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Miriana Tona
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
17
Aces
7
11
Double Faults
5
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Miriana Tona | Eliessa Vanlangendonck |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 65% (15/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (36/24) | 62% (34/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (298/266) | 55% (284/235) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (16/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:57:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 304.42 | 151.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1269/1838) | 64% (1057/1639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (750/1269) | 59% (622/1057) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (260/569) | 47% (271/582) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (115/241) | 57% (128/224) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (847/1806) | 50% (846/1694) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (15/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 65% (15/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (16/24) | 65% (15/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (8/4) | 20% (5/1) |
Miriana Tona Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Miriana Tona
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
14%
(
3 of
21)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Cadence Brace
73%
(
80 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(15) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
65%
(
80 of
123)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
8
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
57 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Miriana Tona
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Mariana Isabel Higuita Barraza
61%
(
73 of
120)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
13
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
49 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Esther Vyrlan
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Miriana Tona
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Gabriela Ce
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Eliessa Vanlangendonck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Patricija Paukstyte
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Dayeon Back
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
95 of
131)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
52 of
95)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
64 of
131)
122
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Sara Daavettila
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Emily Welker
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Marie Villet
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Jessica Failla
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Olivia Carneiro
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tona Vs Vanlangendonck Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
