Matic Spec vs Joshua Sheehy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Spec vs Sheehy analysis and find out who is favored!
Matic Spec vs Joshua Sheehy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Spec has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sheehy has won 51.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Spec, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sheehy has won 49.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Spec has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sheehy has saved 65.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Spec has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sheehy winning 43.48% (W/L 20/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59). Sheehy has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Spec winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Spec winning 2 and Sheehy winning 0. The last match between Spec and Sheehy was at the M15 Cancun, 23-11-2021, First, Hard with Matic Spec getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Spec and Sheehy have played a deciding set 0 times, with Spec winning 0 times and Sheehy 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Spec winning 0, and Sheehy 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Spec has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sheehy has played against players with an average rank of 189.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Spec has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sheehy has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Spec has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sheehy has converted 47.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Spec 1 - 0 Sheehy
Matic Spec
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
803
Rank
678
High
27
Age
Plays
Joshua Sheehy
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
64% (167-95)
Career Total W/L
51% (90-87)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matic Spec | Joshua Sheehy |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
1st Serve % | 49% (21/43) | 56% (24/43) |
1st Serve Win% | 81% (17/21) | 75% (18/24) |
2nd Serve Win% | 77% (17/22) | 26% (5/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 47% (20/43) | 21% (9/43) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Joshua Sheehy
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matic Spec | Joshua Sheehy |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (21/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (183/197) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.35 |
Aces Total | 0 | 65 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 0 | 52 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:47:14 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 249 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (763/1258) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (498/763) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (263/495) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (42/93) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (444/1197) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/18) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 82% (11/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Joshua Sheehy Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Joshua Sheehy
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Abel Forger
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kris Van Wyk
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Giles Hussey
Player
Joshua Sheehy
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
5
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Trochu
Player
Joshua Sheehy
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Vadym Ursu
Player
Joshua Sheehy
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Lasse Poertner
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Yousef Khamis
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more