Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mate Valkusz vs Paul Woerner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Valkusz vs Woerner analysis and find out who is favored!
Mate Valkusz vs Paul Woerner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Valkusz has won 42.42% of points on his second serve, while Woerner has won 42.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Valkusz, in recent form, has won 51% of his opponent's second serve points, while Woerner has won 50.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.12% and 37.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Valkusz has saved 59.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Woerner has saved 58.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Valkusz has won 56.1% of matches played (W/L 23/ 18), with Woerner winning 40% (W/L 18/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Valkusz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 164/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Woerner has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 236/ 175), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Valkusz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 18/ 12), where as Woerner has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 18/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Valkusz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Valkusz winning 2 and Woerner winning 0. The last match between Valkusz and Woerner was at the Germany F11 (Karlsruhe), 15-08-2017, First, Clay with Mate Valkusz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Valkusz and Woerner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Valkusz winning 0 times and Woerner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Valkusz winning 0, and Woerner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Valkusz has played against opponents with an average rank of 300.05 while Woerner has played against players with an average rank of 168.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Valkusz has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Woerner has won 86% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Valkusz has converted 41.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Woerner has converted 42.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Valkusz 1 - 0 Woerner
227
Rank
204
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
644
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
67% (205-102)
Career Total W/L
54% (290-246)
38% (3-5)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$132,900
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mate Valkusz | Paul Woerner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:0 | 1:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (35/50) | 73% (46/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 70% (32/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 73% (11/15) | 6% (1/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (30/63) | 28% (14/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Mate Valkusz
Player
Paul Woerner
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mate Valkusz | Paul Woerner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (3/5) | 50% (9/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (9/12) | 46% (18/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (91/105) | 50% (188/189) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:41 | 1:36:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.75 | 114.89 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (414/635) | 65% (703/1086) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (281/414) | 63% (440/703) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (92/221) | 43% (166/383) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (24/62) | 41% (45/110) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (247/634) | 42% (441/1048) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 25% (12/3) |
Mate Valkusz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Mate Valkusz
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Mate Valkusz
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Mate Valkusz
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Mate Valkusz
60%
(
81 of
136)
1st Serve %
66%
(
89 of
135)
17
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
11
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
66 of
89)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
45 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
48 of
135)
139
Total Points Won
132
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Andrea Vavassori
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Francisco Comesana
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Mate Valkusz
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Mate Valkusz
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Daniel Altmaier
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Woerner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Markus Molder
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Paul Woerner
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Paul Woerner
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ha Minh Duc Vu
Player
Paul Woerner
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Orel Kimhi
Player
Paul Woerner
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Boris Pokotilov
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Aaron Cohen
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Paul Woerner
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Anapat Timangkul
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Valkusz Vs Woerner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
