Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marta Soriano Santiago vs Eudice Wong Chong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Santiago vs Chong analysis and find out who is favored!
Marta Soriano Santiago vs Eudice Wong Chong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Santiago has won 48% of points on his second serve, while Chong has won 44.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Santiago, in recent form, has won 53.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chong has won 53.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.88% and 38.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Santiago has saved 44.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chong has saved 57.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Santiago has won 50% of matches played (W/L 8/ 8), with Chong winning 56.14% (W/L 32/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Santiago has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 17/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9). Chong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 182/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 12/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Santiago has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Chong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.49% of matches (W/L 31/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Santiago winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Santiago winning 0 and Chong winning 2. The last match between Santiago and Chong was at the W15 Monastir, 23-12-2021, Second, Hard with Eudice Wong Chong getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Santiago and Chong have played a deciding set 0 times, with Santiago winning 0 times and Chong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Santiago winning 0, and Chong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Santiago has played against opponents with an average rank of 233.25 while Chong has played against players with an average rank of 287.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Santiago has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chong has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Santiago has converted 35.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chong has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Santiago 0 - 1 Chong
694
Rank
578
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
299
Rank
213
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
56% (28-22)
Career Total W/L
58% (212-156)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
39% (7-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,095
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marta Soriano Santiago | Eudice Wong Chong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (23/50) | 59% (29/49) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (12/23) | 72% (21/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (8/27) | 50% (10/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (18/49) | 60% (30/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
23 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marta Soriano Santiago | Eudice Wong Chong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 39% (7/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (18/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (198/216) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:51:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 340.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (891/1316) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (544/891) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (199/425) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (64/135) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (550/1309) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 39% (7/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (7/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 63% (8/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (8/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Marta Soriano Santiago Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sarah Tatu
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
54 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Ottavia Ghirardato
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tatiana Prozorova
Player
Marta Soriano Santiago
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Jessica Failla
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Dea Herdzelas
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Destanee Aiava
43%
(
32 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Soriano Santiago
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
104)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Eudice Wong Chong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Erika Sema
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Sakura Hosogi
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Sayaka Ishii
76%
(
79 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Rina Saigo
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
118)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Mio Mushika
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
109)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Santiago Vs Chong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
