Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maegan Manasse vs Jamie Loeb Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Manasse vs Loeb analysis and find out who is favored!
Maegan Manasse vs Jamie Loeb Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Manasse has won 51.04% of points on his second serve, while Loeb has won 48.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Manasse, in recent form, has won 54.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loeb has won 53.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.91% and 39.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Manasse has saved 57.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loeb has saved 55.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Manasse has won 75% of matches played (W/L 12/ 4), with Loeb winning 50.85% (W/L 30/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Manasse has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 17/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 10/ 8). Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Manasse has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4), where as Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.79% of matches (W/L 29/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Manasse winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Manasse winning 2 and Loeb winning 0. The last match between Manasse and Loeb was at the W100 Charleston, 30-06-2022, First, Clay with Maegan Manasse getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Manasse and Loeb have played a deciding set 0 times, with Manasse winning 0 times and Loeb 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Manasse winning 0, and Loeb 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Manasse has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.63 while Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 293.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Manasse has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loeb has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Manasse has converted 52.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loeb has converted 48.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Manasse 1 - 0 Loeb
790
Rank
327
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
60% (102-68)
Career Total W/L
55% (295-244)
75% (12-4)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$219,866
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maegan Manasse | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (35/59) | 51% (31/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 52% (16/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (12/24) | 43% (13/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/6) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (32/61) | 37% (22/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Maegan Manasse
Player
Jamie Loeb
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maegan Manasse | Jamie Loeb |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (12/4) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (26/12) | 57% (35/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (206/148) | 54% (300/256) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (12/3) | 80% (8/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 89 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:30 | 1:43:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.63 | 314.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (695/1079) | 55% (955/1747) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (430/695) | 67% (638/955) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (196/384) | 49% (386/791) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (76/144) | 47% (104/222) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (523/1089) | 45% (817/1805) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 58% (15/11) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (12/16) | 60% (15/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (6/3) | 18% (11/2) |
Maegan Manasse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Maegan Manasse
77%
(
102 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
78 of
133)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
47 of
78)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
48%
(
64 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
64 of
133)
132
Total Points Won
133
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Maegan Manasse
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Xinxin Yao
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Ayano Shimizu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Sofia Costoulas
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Momoko Kobori
72%
(
72 of
100)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maegan Manasse
Player
Haruna Arakawa
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
80%
(
109 of
136)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
53%
(
58 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
75 of
136)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
6-7(2) 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Bronte Murgett
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Manasse Vs Loeb Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
