Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Sachia Vickery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Vickery analysis and find out who is favored!
Maddison Inglis vs Sachia Vickery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 47.2% of points on his second serve, while Vickery has won 45.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 55.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vickery has won 59.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.9% and 41.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 57.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vickery has saved 52.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 60.66% of matches played (W/L 37/ 24), with Vickery winning 58.33% (W/L 35/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Vickery has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 23/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 34/ 20), where as Vickery has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Inglis winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Vickery winning 1. The last match between Inglis and Vickery was at the W60 Burnie, 02-02-2020, Final, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Vickery have played a deciding set 1 times, with Inglis winning 1 times and Vickery 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 0, and Vickery 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.54 while Vickery has played against players with an average rank of 249.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vickery has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 47.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vickery has converted 47.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Inglis 1 - 0 Vickery
226
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
127
Rank
73
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
59% (248-173)
Career Total W/L
57% (382-293)
68% (17-8)
YTD W/L
59% (16-11)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$1,074,025
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Sachia Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:35:0 | 2:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (68/103) | 71% (85/119) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (37/68) | 59% (50/85) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 35% (12/34) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (57/119) | 45% (46/103) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sachia Vickery
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
50 of
85)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
57 of
119)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Sachia Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (17/8) | 59% (16/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (39/21) | 57% (35/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (316/246) | 54% (314/271) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 64% (9/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 91 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 109 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:35 | 1:41:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 326.4 | 227 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1051/1731) | 53% (1042/1951) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (707/1051) | 63% (657/1042) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (322/680) | 46% (417/909) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (109/233) | 47% (129/273) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (863/1867) | 48% (949/1979) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 71% (10/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (15/6) | 56% (5/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (17/25) | 59% (16/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 17% (12/2) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Maddison Inglis
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
13
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
31%
(
17 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Stacey Fung
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Yexin Ma
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arina Rodionova
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kyoka Okamura
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sachia Vickery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Sachia Vickery
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
33%
(
12 of
36)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
49
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Sachia Vickery
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Rebeka Masarova
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Sachia Vickery
55%
(
60 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
1
15
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Greetje Minnen
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Sachia Vickery
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Mccartney Kessler
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Lauren Davis
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Inglis Vs Vickery Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
