Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luksika Kumkhum vs Olivia Rogowska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kumkhum vs Rogowska analysis and find out who is favored!
Luksika Kumkhum vs Olivia Rogowska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kumkhum has won 51.01% of points on his second serve, while Rogowska has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kumkhum, in recent form, has won 53.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rogowska has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.46% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kumkhum has saved 37.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rogowska has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kumkhum has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 14/ 10), with Rogowska winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kumkhum has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 327/ 157), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9). Rogowska has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 266/ 184), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kumkhum has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Rogowska has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kumkhum winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kumkhum winning 2 and Rogowska winning 1. The last match between Kumkhum and Rogowska was at the BMW Malaysian Open - Kuala Lumpur, 27-02-2013, First, Hard with Luksika Kumkhum getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kumkhum and Rogowska have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kumkhum winning 1 times and Rogowska 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kumkhum winning 0, and Rogowska 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kumkhum has played against opponents with an average rank of 315.58 while Rogowska has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kumkhum has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rogowska has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kumkhum has converted 44.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rogowska has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kumkhum 1 - 0 Rogowska
666
Rank
66
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
102
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
65% (385-203)
Career Total W/L
56% (373-291)
67% (2-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$536,963
Career Prize Money
$334,778
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Luksika Kumkhum | Olivia Rogowska |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:18 | 1:39:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (35/63) | 69% (47/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (27/35) | 55% (26/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (17/28) | 57% (12/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (30/68) | 30% (19/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Olivia Rogowska
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luksika Kumkhum | Olivia Rogowska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (33/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 358.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (99/165) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (64/99) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 59% (39/66) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (12/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (92/204) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Luksika Kumkhum Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
14
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Sakura Hosogi
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Kateryna Volodko
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
En Shuo Liang
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Luksika Kumkhum
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
8
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Punnin Kovapitukted
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Olivia Rogowska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Olivia Rogowska
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Olivia Rogowska
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jennifer Elie
Player
Olivia Rogowska
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Olivia Rogowska
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Rogowska
Player
Jennifer Elie
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Rogowska
Player
Tereza Mihalikova
47%
(
49 of
105)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
111)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
9
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyoka Okamura
Player
Olivia Rogowska
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Rogowska
Player
Nudnida Luangnam
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Rogowska
Player
Sara Tomic
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Rogowska
Player
Alicia Smith
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kumkhum Vs Rogowska Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
