Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luis Patino vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Patino vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
Luis Patino vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patino has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 49.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patino, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 45.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patino has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 61.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patino has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kirchheimer winning 50% (W/L 28/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patino has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 63/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 5/ 10). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Patino winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Patino winning 0 and Kirchheimer winning 4. The last match between Patino and Kirchheimer was at the M25 Edwardsville, 07-08-2019, First, Hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Patino and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Patino winning 0 times and Kirchheimer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Patino winning 0, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patino has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 291.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patino has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patino has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 37.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Patino 0 - 2 Kirchheimer
897
Rank
567
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
486
Rank
375
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
45% (195-238)
Career Total W/L
56% (273-212)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$3,260
Career Prize Money
$3,990
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patino VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Luis Patino | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 11 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (72/127) | 60% (56/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (45/72) | 84% (47/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (21/55) | 68% (26/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 47% (7/15) |
| Return Points W% | 22% (21/94) | 48% (61/127) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Patino VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Luis Patino
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Luis Patino
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luis Patino | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (17/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (161/182) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:51:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 491.93 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (678/1099) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (472/678) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (211/421) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (31/79) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (369/1057) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Luis Patino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Luis Patino
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luis Patino
Player
Siddhant Banthia
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luis Patino
Player
Alexander Bernard
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luis Patino
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luis Patino
Player
Luis Britto
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Luis Patino
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Luis Patino
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Luis Patino
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
23
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Luis Patino
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Luis Patino
37%
(
27 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Sekou Bangoura
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Patino Vs Kirchheimer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
