Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lucas Gerch vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gerch vs Tiffon analysis and find out who is favored!
Lucas Gerch vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gerch has won 50.34% of points on his second serve, while Tiffon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gerch, in recent form, has won 52.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tiffon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.69% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gerch has saved 52.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tiffon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gerch has won 67.19% of matches played (W/L 43/ 21), with Tiffon winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gerch has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 188/ 102), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 55/ 46). Tiffon has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Gerch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.29% of matches (W/L 29/ 5), where as Tiffon has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gerch has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.44 while Tiffon has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gerch has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tiffon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gerch has converted 46.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tiffon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gerch 0 - 0 Tiffon
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lucas Gerch | Pol MARTIN Tiffon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (29/23) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (248/231) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 71 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 67 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:49 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 230.32 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (873/1461) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (605/873) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (296/588) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (74/159) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (652/1559) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/6) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 74% (14/5) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 1st Match |
Lucas Gerch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Massimo Giunta
Player
Lucas Gerch
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
14 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Lucas Gerch
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
11 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Stefan Palosi
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(1) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Manuel Lazic
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniele Rapagnetta
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Lucas Gerch
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pol MARTIN Tiffon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Martin Krumich
35%
(
18 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
27 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
105)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
123)
111
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Lucas Bouquet
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Tristan Mccormick
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerch Vs Tiffon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
